TeamViewer Bundle
Who owns TeamViewer SE?
TeamViewer’s 2019 Frankfurt IPO moved control from private equity to public markets, creating a widely dispersed shareholder base while founders and institutions retain influence through board seats and stakes.
As of 2024–2025, TeamViewer is a publicly listed SE with a free-float dominated by institutional investors; revenue guidance for 2024 is around €627–€635 million and adjusted EBITDA margins in the high-40% to 50%+.
Who Owns TeamViewer Company? Major shareholders are institutional investors and former private equity exited after the IPO; governance reflects a dispersed public ownership with board representation from key investors. See TeamViewer Porter's Five Forces Analysis
Who Founded TeamViewer?
TeamViewer was founded in 2005 within the German developer ecosystem, with lead technologists including Tilo Rossmanith and an early engineering team who turned a remote-desktop codebase into the commercial product under TeamViewer GmbH. Early ownership was concentrated among founders and key employees, with typical GmbH vesting and transfer provisions rather than a disclosed Silicon Valley-style cap table.
Founding Team
Technology-led founders, including Tilo Rossmanith, drove the initial product and early commercialization in 2005–2007.
Early Ownership
Ownership in the mid-to-late 2000s remained concentrated with founders and early employees; specific equity splits were not publicly disclosed.
Capital Strategy
Growth was largely product-led and bootstrapped, with freemium adoption fueling user expansion before external sponsors emerged.
Absence of Early VC
There is no public record of a classic early-stage VC cap table; any friends-and-family or angel stakes were minor or later bought out.
Founder Liquidity
Significant founder liquidity events occurred during the subsequent private equity majority buyout and later sponsor-led transactions.
Governance
Early GmbH articles typically governed share transfers, buy-sell provisions and vesting—standard for German startups of that era.
Early control emphasized engineering and product-first growth, reinvesting revenue into cross-platform support and internationalization to build scale prior to sponsor ownership.
Key facts and implications
Founders and early employees retained concentrated control through the company’s formative years, setting the foundation for later ownership changes and public listing dynamics; see related market context in Target Market of TeamViewer.
- Who owns TeamViewer initially: founders and early employees held primary stakes.
- TeamViewer ownership structure 2025: evolved from GmbH founder control to private equity and then public ownership events.
- Did Permira ever own TeamViewer: Permira acquired a majority stake in 2014 (public records confirm sponsor involvement in later ownership stages).
- TeamViewer founder ownership stake: founders realized liquidity during PE buyouts; exact early percentages were not publicly disclosed.
TeamViewer SWOT Analysis
- Complete SWOT Breakdown
- Fully Customizable
- Editable in Excel & Word
- Professional Formatting
- Investor-Ready Format
How Has TeamViewer’s Ownership Changed Over Time?
Key events reshaping TeamViewer ownership include Permira’s 2014 buyout at an enterprise value near €870 million, the 2019 Frankfurt IPO raising ~€2.2 billion in a secondary-heavy offering, subsequent Permira stake reductions and exit by 2022–2023, and ongoing buybacks and rising institutional ownership through 2024–2025.
| Year | Event | Ownership Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Permira acquisition from GFI Software/Ascendum | Majority control; scale-and-monetize strategy; subscription push |
| 2019 | IPO (Frankfurt: TMV) at €26.25; Permira sells large secondary block | Free float expands; market cap ~€5.25–€5.5bn; institutional participation rises |
| 2020–2021 | Permira follow-on placements; marquee sponsorships | Permira stake reduced below key thresholds; investor debate on marketing ROI |
| 2022–2024 | Institutional accumulation, ETFs and index inclusion | Dispersed shareholder base; largest holders generally 10% |
| 2023–2025 | Share buybacks and treasury builds; corporate form SE | Slight share retirement; one-share-one-vote preserved; no controlling shareholder |
Current shareholder landscape (2024–2025): institutional investors and index funds collectively hold the majority, retail/free float is substantial after Permira’s exit, insiders own low single-digit percentages, and treasury shares are low-single-digit from buybacks; this influences governance, capital allocation, and focus on profitability metrics like EBITDA margins near 48–50%+.
Ownership evolution at a glance
Shift from PE control to a widely held public company changed strategic priorities and shareholder engagement.
- 2014: Permira buys TeamViewer for ~€870m
- 2019: IPO raises ~€2.2bn for Permira; market cap ~€5.25–€5.5bn
- 2022–2025: Dispersed ownership; top holders typically below 10%
- Ongoing: Buybacks, treasury shares and institutional ETF inclusion increase liquidity and passive ownership
For detailed strategic context including product initiatives and marketing spend tied to ownership changes, see Growth Strategy of TeamViewer
TeamViewer PESTLE Analysis
- Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
- No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
- Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
- Instant Download, Ready to Use
- 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Who Sits on TeamViewer’s Board?
As of 2024–2025 the TeamViewer SE board follows a one-tier model with one-share-one-vote; membership combines independent non-executive directors and executive management, and there are no dual-class or golden shares affecting TeamViewer ownership.
| Board Role | Typical Background | Voting/Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Independent Chair (non-executive) | SaaS, governance, EU capital markets | Leads audit & remuneration committees; independent oversight |
| Independent non-executive directors | Cybersecurity, software, finance | One-share-one-vote aligns voting with economic ownership |
| CEO (executive director) | Management, operations | Represents management on board; executives attend but usually not board members |
Voting power at TeamViewer SE is proportional to shareholdings; after Permira's exit there are no designated controlling-shareholder seats, and shareholder engagement tracks the German Corporate Governance Code with typically high AGM approval rates for capital authorizations and board matters.
Board and Voting Highlights
Board composition and voting at TeamViewer reflect a dispersed free float and standard German governance practices.
- One-share-one-vote: no dual-class or founder special rights
- Independent chair and audit/remuneration committees in place
- CEO serves as executive director; other execs attend meetings
- Proxy fights uncommon; investor focus on marketing spend, ESG, buybacks
For context on how ownership evolved, see the Brief History of TeamViewer; major shareholders in 2025 remained institutional investors on a dispersed register, and voting outcomes at AGMs have shown approval rates often above 90% for routine resolutions.
TeamViewer Business Model Canvas
- Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
- Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
- Investor-Ready BMC Format
- 100% Editable and Customizable
- Clear and Structured Layout
What Recent Changes Have Shaped TeamViewer’s Ownership Landscape?
Since 2022 TeamViewer ownership trends have been shaped by sizeable buybacks, rising institutionalization and governance shifts; repurchases and index inclusion have concentrated free float while management balances buybacks with selective M&A and conservative leverage through 2025.
| Topic | Key Development | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Buybacks (2022–2025) | Programs cumulatively authorized in the €300–€600 million range; active repurchases in 2024–2025 | Reduced share count, higher EPS, treasury shares in low-single-digit % of shares outstanding |
| Capital allocation | Net leverage kept conservative for a software issuer; buybacks plus selective AR/remote-support M&A | Maintains balance-sheet flexibility while supporting growth initiatives |
| Institutionalization | Index inclusion and ETF growth increased passive ownership; active funds rotated in 2023 | By 2025 institutions represent the largest shareholder cohort; renewed active interest as margins and enterprise SKU growth improved |
| Marketing & brand | Post-2022 reevaluation of high-cost sports sponsorships under investor pressure | Improved marketing efficiency; supports sustained 48–50%+ adjusted EBITDA margin guidance |
| Governance | Completed shift to SE structure; no dual-class shares; independent board majority | Remuneration tied to ARR growth, churn and FCF; governance aligns with institutional expectations |
| Outlook (2025) | Management and analysts guide steady ARR growth and disciplined buybacks; no privatization signals | Ownership expected to remain dispersed with institutions leading unless a strategic bid emerges |
Buybacks have materially altered TeamViewer ownership and share metrics, while index-driven passive inflows and disciplined governance have reinforced institutional confidence; see a deeper strategic view in the article Marketing Strategy of TeamViewer.
Buybacks and share concentration
Buyback authorizations between 2022–2024 totaled roughly €300–€600 million, with ongoing repurchases into 2025 lowering share count and lifting EPS and free-float concentration.
Institutional ownership
ETF inclusion and index tracking increased passive 'Who owns TeamViewer' exposure; institutional investors are now the primary holders, while active managers rotated through 2023 volatility.
Governance and structure
The company completed its SE conversion without adopting dual-class voting; board independence and pay linked to ARR, churn and FCF address investor concerns about 'TeamViewer ownership structure 2025'.
Strategic outlook
No evidence of privatization or controlling-stake transactions as of 2025; ownership likely to remain widely dispersed unless a large software consolidator or infrastructure investor mounts a bid.
TeamViewer Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
- Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
- 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
- Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
- Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
- What is Brief History of TeamViewer Company?
- What is Competitive Landscape of TeamViewer Company?
- What is Growth Strategy and Future Prospects of TeamViewer Company?
- How Does TeamViewer Company Work?
- What is Sales and Marketing Strategy of TeamViewer Company?
- What are Mission Vision & Core Values of TeamViewer Company?
- What is Customer Demographics and Target Market of TeamViewer Company?
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.