Array Technologies Bundle
Who owns Array Technologies now?
When Array Technologies IPOed in October 2020 it shifted from private equity ownership into public markets; founded in 1989, the company is a leading maker of single-axis solar trackers serving utility-scale projects worldwide.
Ownership is widely dispersed among institutional investors, index funds, and insiders, with no single controlling shareholder; recent years saw growth via the 2022 STI Norland acquisition.
See Array Technologies Porter's Five Forces Analysis for strategic context.
Who Founded Array Technologies?
Founders and Early Ownership of Array Technologies traces to 1989 when Ronald P. 'Ron' Corio founded the company and maintained principal ownership and CEO control as the firm grew from a regional manufacturer into a utility-scale solar supplier.
Founder and Start
Ron Corio founded Array Technologies in 1989 and bootstrapped operations using operating cash flow and modest private capital.
Early Ownership
Array operated as a closely held private company with Corio holding the vast majority of equity; precise inception splits were not publicly disclosed.
Capital Sources
1990s–2000s growth funded mainly by cash flow and private regional investors; no major institutional VC rounds are widely cited for that period.
PE Transition
In 2016 Oaktree Capital Management acquired a majority stake, shifting control from founder-led ownership to a financial sponsor structure.
Governance Changes
Standard sponsor-led terms included founder vesting and buy-sell arrangements; Corio reduced active leadership and equity ahead of public offering plans.
Preserved Priorities
Engineering focus on high-reliability hardware and cost leadership remained a governance priority through the private equity period.
Public records show the 2016 Oaktree deal enabled scale-up to meet rising U.S. utility solar demand; subsequent ownership changes prepared the company for broader shareholder registry and eventual public market activity.
Key Ownership Facts
Founders and early investors shaped Array Technologies' trajectory; notable ownership milestones include founder majority control pre-2016 and Oaktree's majority acquisition in 2016.
- Founded by Ronald P. 'Ron' Corio in 1989
- Operated as a closely held private company with founder-majority equity through 2015
- Oaktree Capital Management bought a majority stake in 2016, transitioning control to a PE sponsor
- Founder reduced active leadership and ownership ahead of public-market preparations
For related market positioning and customer segments see Target Market of Array Technologies
Array Technologies SWOT Analysis
- Complete SWOT Breakdown
- Fully Customizable
- Editable in Excel & Word
- Professional Formatting
- Investor-Ready Format
How Has Array Technologies’s Ownership Changed Over Time?
Key events reshaped Array Technologies ownership from founder-led control to sponsor ownership under Oaktree in 2016, a public listing in October 2020 that raised roughly $1.0 billion gross, and subsequent follow-ons and strategic M&A (STI Norland) that diversified the register and increased institutional holdings through 2024–2025.
| Year / Event | Ownership Impact | Key Stakeholders |
|---|---|---|
| 2016: Oaktree majority acquisition | Transitioned governance to sponsor-era model; capital for expansion | Oaktree Capital Management (majority) |
| Oct 2020: IPO (NASDAQ: ARRY) | Raised ~$1.0 billion gross; broadened to public shareholders; market cap briefly > $5 billion in 2020 rally | Public investors, Oaktree (selling down) |
| 2021–2022: Follow-ons & STI Norland acquisition | Introduced legacy STI shareholders; altered cap table; international revenue mix increased; deal ~€570M | STI legacy shareholders, Array public holders |
| 2023–2025: Index inclusion & institutional depth | Passive funds and large active managers drove institutional ownership often > 80%; insiders low single digits | BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, Fidelity, Wellington; dispersed public register |
Current ownership is predominantly institutional and global, with Oaktree reduced to minority or exited positions by 2022; Array remains a standalone public company with one-share-one-vote governance and independent board oversight.
Ownership Evolution Snapshot
Major shifts: founder to sponsor in 2016, IPO in 2020, STI Norland deal 2022, index inclusion 2023–2025.
- Oaktree led sponsor-era growth and later sold down into the IPO
- IPO raised ~$1.0 billion; peak 2020 market cap > $5 billion
- STI Norland deal (~€570 million) added international shareholders and revenues
- Institutional ownership commonly > 80%; insider ownership low single digits
For further background on corporate milestones and historical ownership context see Brief History of Array Technologies
Array Technologies PESTLE Analysis
- Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
- No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
- Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
- Instant Download, Ready to Use
- 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Who Sits on Array Technologies’s Board?
As of mid-2025 Array Technologies' board comprises the CEO/President, a majority of independent directors with backgrounds in industrial manufacturing, energy infrastructure and capital markets, and directors with deep solar value-chain experience; committee chairs for audit, compensation and nominating/governance are independent.
| Director | Background | Independence / Role |
|---|---|---|
| CEO / President | Executive leadership, solar operations | Executive director |
| Independent Director A | Industrial manufacturing, operations | Independent; Audit Committee Chair |
| Independent Director B | Energy infrastructure, utilities | Independent; Compensation Committee Chair |
| Independent Director C | Capital markets, M&A | Independent; Nominating/Governance Chair |
| Director with solar value-chain experience | Project development / supply chain | Independent / Non-executive |
Array operates a one-share-one-vote capital structure with no dual-class shares, golden shares or super-voting provisions; voting power equals economic ownership and institutional holders exert influence via proxy policies.
Board and Voting Snapshot
Board composition favors independents; Oaktree-linked private equity directors reduced after IPO and by 2025 no PE control remains. Routine proxy matters have occurred without major activist-led turnover through 2024–2025.
- One-share-one-vote structure aligns voting with economic ownership
- Committees (audit, comp, nom/gov) chaired by independents
- Large passive institutional holders hold meaningful sway via proxy voting
- No disclosed golden shares, super-votes, or founder special rights
For governance context and investor outreach, see Marketing Strategy of Array Technologies
Array Technologies Business Model Canvas
- Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
- Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
- Investor-Ready BMC Format
- 100% Editable and Customizable
- Clear and Structured Layout
What Recent Changes Have Shaped Array Technologies’s Ownership Landscape?
Recent ownership trends at Array Technologies show a steady shift toward institutional and passive holders since 2022, driven by strategic M&A and broader index inclusions that expanded the company’s investor base and liquidity.
| Year | Key Ownership Development | Impact / Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Acquisition of STI Norland; stock consideration broadened shareholder mix | Expanded Europe/Latin America exposure and reinforced leadership in single-axis trackers |
| 2023–2024 | Index inclusions; increased index-fund and institutional holdings | Higher passive ownership as active managers repositioned amid supply-chain normalization and IRA-driven U.S. pipelines |
| 2024–2025 | Concentration among large asset managers; modest buybacks | No controlling shareholder; capital prioritized for working capital, R&D and international growth |
Institutional ownership rose to a plurality of the float by 2025, with top passive holders among the largest shareholders; insider ownership remained low and Array retained a single-class share structure with no privatization plans reported.
2022: Strategic M&A
The STI Norland deal in 2022 used stock consideration, diversifying Array Technologies shareholders and increasing exposure to Europe and Latin America while boosting global tracker scale.
Index and Passive Inflows
From 2023–2024, index inclusions lifted passive ownership; major funds increased positions as utility-scale solar procurement accelerated under the IRA and supply chains normalized.
Top Institutional Presence
By 2025, large asset managers such as BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street were among the largest institutional holders, reflecting sector-wide passive concentration trends and improved liquidity.
Capital Allocation & Governance
Array prioritized working capital, selective R&D and international growth; buybacks were modest relative to float and no dual-class or privatization actions were reported, leaving control dispersed.
For additional context on corporate direction and values related to ownership and strategy, see Mission, Vision & Core Values of Array Technologies
Array Technologies Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
- Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
- 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
- Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
- Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
- What is Brief History of Array Technologies Company?
- What is Competitive Landscape of Array Technologies Company?
- What is Growth Strategy and Future Prospects of Array Technologies Company?
- How Does Array Technologies Company Work?
- What is Sales and Marketing Strategy of Array Technologies Company?
- What are Mission Vision & Core Values of Array Technologies Company?
- What is Customer Demographics and Target Market of Array Technologies Company?
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.