hhgregg Porter's Five Forces Analysis
Fully Editable
Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets
Professional Design
Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates
Pre-Built
For Quick And Efficient Use
No Expertise Is Needed
Easy To Follow
hhgregg Bundle
Elevate Your Analysis with the Complete Porter's Five Forces Analysis
hhgregg faces intense competitive pressure from large national retailers, thin margins, and shifting consumer preferences toward online appliance and electronics purchases, while supplier leverage and substitute threats remain meaningful concerns. Our snapshot highlights key tensions in pricing, distribution, and brand loyalty. This brief preview only scratches the surface. Unlock the full Porter's Five Forces Analysis to explore hhgregg’s competitive dynamics and strategic implications in detail.
Suppliers Bargaining Power
Concentrated OEM brand control
Major appliance and TV categories are dominated by a few global OEMs (Samsung, LG, Whirlpool), concentrating leverage; Samsung held ~31% of global TV shipments in 2023 (Omdia) and Whirlpool ~13% share of US major appliance shipments in 2023 (Statista).
These brands can dictate terms, assortments and co-op marketing access, and hhgregg’s dependence on recognized brands limits its ability to credibly threaten backward integration.
Vendor de-listings or reduced allocations can materially constrict category breadth and shelf depth for hhgregg.
MAP policies and pricing constraints
MAP programs restrict hhgregg’s discounting flexibility, forcing advertised price floors that limit price-based competition across comparable SKUs. Compliance was typically required to maintain authorized dealer status and access to vendor promotions, reducing hhgregg’s autonomy to undercut rivals. For context, hhgregg reported net sales of $2.36 billion in 2016, so MAP-driven margin compression on promotional matches could materially impact profitability.
Allocation and supply chain volatility
Allocation from semiconductor cycles, constrained freight capacity and Nov-Dec seasonal peaks give suppliers allocation power; NRF projected 2024 holiday retail growth of about 3–4%, concentrating demand. Vendors often favor big-box/marketplace channels during shortages, raising hhgregg’s lead-time variability and inventory risk. That increases stockout-driven lost sales or forces costly spot buys at premium rates.
Limited private-label alternatives
hhgregg's lack of strong private-label or exclusive SKUs left few internal substitutes, keeping switching power low and supplier dependence high; OEM exclusives historically favor larger chains, reinforcing vendor clout. Accessories provide some assortment control but represented a small revenue share, consistent with appliance accessory mixes under 10% industrywide in recent years. This structural dependence constrained hhgregg's negotiating leverage.
- Limited private-label presence
- OEM exclusives to larger retailers
- Accessories <10% revenue — small mix control
Vendor services and coop marketing dependency
Vendor launch marketing, MDF/co-op funds (typically 1–3% of product revenue) and supplier-provided training materially drive hhgregg sell-through; access is often performance- and compliance-based, which amplifies supplier leverage. Losing these funds raises customer acquisition cost and weakens price competitiveness, while incentives tied to volume commitments shift inventory and margin risk to the retailer.
- MDF/co-op: 1–3% of product revenue
- Access: performance/compliance-based
- Impact: higher CAC, weaker price competitiveness
- Risk: incentives linked to volume commitments
Supplier concentration and OEM exclusives squeeze promos, raising stockout costs
Supplier concentration (Samsung ~31% TV 2023; Whirlpool ~13% US appliances 2023) and OEM exclusives give suppliers high leverage over hhgregg, limiting backward integration or price-setting. MAP and performance-tied MDF (1–3% of revenue) constrain promotional flexibility and raise CAC; accessories <10% revenue offer little offset. Holiday/semiconductor allocation risks (NRF 2024 holiday +3–4%) increase stockout and spot-buy costs.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Samsung TV share (2023) | ~31% |
| Whirlpool US appliance share (2023) | ~13% |
| MDF/co-op | 1–3% revenue |
| Accessories revenue mix | <10% |
| hhgregg net sales (2016) | $2.36B |
| NRF holiday growth (2024) | ~3–4% |
What is included in the product
Detailed Word Document
Tailored Porter’s Five Forces analysis for hhgregg that uncovers key competitive drivers, supplier and buyer power, threats from substitutes and new entrants, and identifies disruptive forces and market dynamics affecting pricing and profitability.
Customizable Excel Spreadsheet
Clear one-sheet Porter's Five Forces for hhgregg—instantly reveals supplier, buyer, entrant, substitute, and rivalry pressures to speed strategic decisions. Customize scores and export clean charts for decks or boardrooms, no macros required.
Customers Bargaining Power
High price transparency online
High online price transparency lets consumers instantly compare prices, delivery dates and reviews across retailers — 86% of shoppers in 2024 reported comparing prices online before purchase. Low switching costs mean customers defect over small price gaps, forcing hhgregg toward thin margins and aggressive price-matching. Retailers now must offer dynamic deals and bundled value to retain buyers and protect conversion rates.
Large-ticket, considered purchases
Appliances and TVs are high-ticket, considered purchases that drive intensive buyer deliberation and bargaining for hhgregg, with customers routinely seeking promotions, financing and bundled-value offers to lower perceived cost. Cart abandonment for big-ticket online purchases remains high, around 70% in e-commerce (2024), unless compelling incentives reduce friction. Post-sale services like haul-away and professional installation often tip final choice toward retailers that bundle them affordably.
Low switching costs and multi-homing
Customers routinely multi-home—browsing Amazon (≈38% of US online retail in 2024), Best Buy and Home Depot alongside manufacturer sites—so hhgregg faces low loyalty absent strong rewards or unique services. Small checkout or delivery frictions trigger churn, and low repeat-purchase frequency raises per-transaction price sensitivity.
Power of reviews and ratings
Peer reviews and third-party ratings now drive hhgregg demand: 92% of shoppers consult reviews before buying (2024), so negative delivery or service feedback can cut conversion sharply within days. Buyers cite reviews to delay purchases or demand discounts, pressuring margins and promotions. Transparent feedback loops force assortment and service adjustments in near real-time.
- 92% consult reviews (2024)
- Negative service reviews lower conversion rapidly
- Customers use reviews to negotiate or wait
Demand for flexible fulfillment
Customers demand fast shipping, precise delivery windows, installation and haul-away, and will penalize fees or delays, forcing retailers like hhgregg to offer concessions; in 2024 online furniture/appliance return rates hovered near 18% and white-glove delivery fees typically range $199–$299, raising fulfillment costs while expectations persist.
High transparency and multihoming: 86% price checks, 70% cart drop
High online price transparency (86% compare prices in 2024) and low switching costs force hhgregg into thin margins and aggressive promotions. Big-ticket deliberation and 70% cart abandonment for large e-commerce items drive heavy use of financing, bundles and service incentives. Multi-homing (Amazon ≈38% share) and 92% review usage give customers strong bargaining leverage; 18% return rates and $199–$299 white-glove fees raise fulfillment pressure.
| Metric | 2024 Data |
|---|---|
| Price comparison | 86% |
| Review consultation | 92% |
| Amazon share (online retail) | ≈38% |
| Cart abandonment (big-ticket) | ≈70% |
| Return rate (furniture/appliance) | ≈18% |
| White-glove fee | $199–$299 |
Preview the Actual Deliverable
hhgregg Porter's Five Forces Analysis
This preview shows the exact hhgregg Porter’s Five Forces analysis you’ll receive after purchase—no placeholders or samples. It examines competitive rivalry, supplier and buyer power, threats of entry and substitution, and practical implications for strategy. The full document is professionally formatted and citation-ready. You’ll get instant access to this identical file upon payment.
Rivalry Among Competitors
Intense omnichannel competition
Amazon controls about 38% of US e-commerce while Walmart holds ~6%, Best Buy reported roughly $42B, Home Depot $157B and Lowe’s $96B in 2024, and all compete on price, availability and services. Brick-and-mortar rivals leverage same-day pickup and in-home installation to defend share. Marketplace sellers (over 50% of Amazon unit sales) broaden assortment and accelerate deal cadence. The result: frequent promotions and sustained margin pressure.
Commodity-like SKUs and spec comparability
Core SKUs are highly comparable, forcing hhgregg into price competition where margins compress and value shifts to bundles, warranties and delivery; the brand relaunches since 2017 lean on these services for differentiation. MAP policies introduced in 2024 narrowed advertised price gaps but raised promotional complexity and reliance on nonprice perks. Content quality and UX now act as critical tiebreakers in conversions.
Advertising and CAC escalation
Performance marketing costs surged in 2024, with search CPC up roughly 18% and social CPM rising about 22%, allowing deeper-pocketed rivals to outbid hhgregg for top placements and branded terms. hhgregg must rebalance spend toward SEO, affiliates and email to defend margins as CAC has climbed ~25% for many consumer electronics sellers. Rising CAC compresses contribution margins rapidly when customer LTV is weak, forcing tighter acquisition discipline and focus on retention.
Service and logistics as differentiators
White-glove delivery, scheduling accuracy and haul-away quality materially drive NPS; 2024 industry estimates place last-mile at ~53% of delivery cost and failed installations can cut NPS by about 15 points, increasing refund/return expenses. Rivals continue heavy investment in last-mile and field-service networks; delivery failures cause costly refunds and reputational damage. Operational excellence is essential to sustain repeat business.
- last-mile ~53% of delivery cost (2024)
- failed installs ≈-15 NPS points (2024)
- refunds and returns spike with delivery failures
- investment in field service = competitive moat
Warranty and financing competition
Extended protection plans and consumer financing are primary profit levers for appliance/electronics retailers; competitors increasingly bundle aggressive 0% APR or instant-credit promotions to win big-ticket sales, forcing hhgregg to secure competitive plan economics and high approval rates to protect margins and attach rates.
- Key levers: warranties, financing
- Competitor tactics: 0% APR, instant credits
- hhgregg focus: negotiate economics & approval
- Risk: weak offers lower big-ticket close rates
Price wars, rising CAC and last-mile drag shrink margins; leader holds 38%
Competitive rivalry is intense: Amazon ~38% US e-commerce, Walmart ~6%, Best Buy revenue ~$42B (2024); price, availability and services drive promotions and margin pressure. Marketing costs (search CPC +18%, social CPM +22%) and CAC +25% favor deep-pocketed rivals. Operational edges (last-mile ~53% of delivery cost; failed installs ≈-15 NPS) decide retention and profitability.
| Metric | Value (2024) |
|---|---|
| Amazon share | 38% |
| Walmart share | 6% |
| Best Buy revenue | $42B |
| Search CPC | +18% |
| Last-mile cost | 53% |
SSubstitutes Threaten
Direct-to-consumer brand channels
OEMs increasingly bypass retailers by selling via their websites and showrooms, with U.S. e-commerce penetration reaching about 16% in 2024, shrinking third-party traffic to hhgregg. Exclusive promos, bundled extended warranties and loyalty incentives on DTC sites pull purchase intent away from retailers. Seamless DTC integrations for installation and scheduling reduce friction and post-sale service dependence on third-party providers. This structural shift lowers hhgregg's bargaining power and revenue share.
Marketplaces and refurbished options
Amazon Marketplace third-party sellers now account for roughly 60% of units sold on the platform (2023), while eBay and certified refurbishers have scaled rapidly, offering 20–40% lower prices on many SKUs.
Consumers increasingly accept open-box/refurbished items to save 10–30%, and third-party warranty parity via insurers and programs erodes hhgregg’s after-sales advantage, siphoning price-sensitive segments.
Rental and subscription models
Appliance and electronics rental/subscription services offer flexibility and lower upfront cost, with a 2024 US survey finding about 42% of 18–34-year-olds preferring subscription access for big-ticket items. Younger or transient households increasingly favor OPEX over CAPEX, shifting demand away from one-time purchases at hhgregg. Easy upgrade paths and bundled service/maintenance further reduce commitment to ownership and substitute for outright retail sales.
Repair and life-extension services
Repair and life-extension services are a growing substitute threat for hhgregg as affordable repairs, parts availability, and extended warranties delay replacement cycles. Proliferation of DIY guides and local technicians empowers consumers to repair rather than replace, and economic slowdowns push households toward maintenance over new purchases. Slower refresh rates reduce unit demand and pressure retailers' margins.
- Affordable repair delays replacements
- Parts availability + warranties lower churn
- DIY/local techs increase repair preference
- Economic downturns tilt to maintenance
- Slower refresh rates cut unit demand
Alternative entertainment and smart ecosystems
Streaming on mobile/tablets substitutes premium TVs for many consumers, with c.80% of users streaming video on mobile in 2024; single-vendor smart home ecosystems (global smart home devices >1bn units in 2024) lock buyers into brand-direct paths, while compact displays and projectors gain share, shifting category mix and compressing margins.
- streaming_mobile:80%_2024
- smart_home_units:>1bn_2024
- compact_projectors:growing_share
- margin_pressure:category_shift
E‑commerce, marketplaces and subscriptions erode retail unit sales; refurb slows churn
OEM DTC, rentals/subscriptions and refurb/repair services cut hhgregg’s unit sales and after‑sales margins; US e‑commerce ~16% (2024) and Amazon third‑party ~60% units (2023) shift share. 42% of 18–34s prefer subscriptions (2024); open‑box saves 10–30% and repairs/DIY extend lifecycles, reducing replacement frequency.
| Substitute | Metric | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| OEM DTC | e‑commerce 16% (2024) | Lower retail share |
| Marketplaces | Amazon 60% units (2023) | Price/volume pressure |
| Subscriptions | 42% 18–34 (2024) | OPEX shift |
| Refurb/repair | 10–30% savings | Slower churn |
Entrants Threaten
Moderate digital entry barriers
Launching an e-commerce site is straightforward, but scaling is hard: typical US e-commerce conversion rates hover near 2% and customer acquisition costs often range $40–$120, pressuring thin electronics margins. Entrants face high CAC, service expectations and logistics for large appliances, while authorized dealer status is required by many premium OEMs. Without OEM authorization assortment narrows and consumer trust drops, raising churn and return costs.
Supply and authorization hurdles
Top OEMs (Whirlpool, Samsung, LG) control roughly 60% of US major-appliance retail share in 2024, limiting door allocations and enforcing strict compliance standards. New entrants routinely fail to secure allocations and coop funds, reducing promotional support and margin flexibility. Lack of vendor backing forces higher working capital and inventory turns, deterring rapid entry into core categories.
Logistics and last-mile complexity
Bulky-item delivery, installation and haul-away require specialized networks and resources, with last-mile often accounting for over 50% of total delivery costs according to industry studies in 2024. Damage and return rates for large appliances and furniture run roughly 5–10% and can erode already-thin margins quickly. Entrants must invest heavily in routing, scheduling systems and vetted service partners, raising upfront CAPEX/OPEX. Poor execution drives negative reviews and higher churn, amplifying customer acquisition costs.
Returns, warranty, and customer service costs
Appliance returns and warranty claims drive high reverse-logistics and service costs, and for hhgregg-like retailers these post-sale expenses can erode margins; e-commerce appliance return rates are around 20% in recent industry data (2024), increasing handling and refurbishment expenses. New entrants lack scale to negotiate favorable reverse-logistics rates and face higher per-unit costs. Strict SLAs and compliance raise fixed service-cost burdens, and weak post-sale support quickly undermines credibility and customer retention.
- Returns rate ~20% (e-commerce appliances, 2024)
- Higher per-unit reverse-logistics costs for small players
- SLAs add fixed-service expense pressure
- Poor post-sale support reduces repeat business
Brand trust and review moats
- Established scale: Best Buy $47.26B FY2024
- Consumer behavior: 98% read reviews (BrightLocal 2023)
- Ramp timeline: 6–12 months to build SEO/review momentum
High CAC, ~2% conversion and 20% returns favor incumbents
High CAC ($40–$120) and low e‑com conversion (~2%) make scale costly; OEMs (Whirlpool/Samsung/LG ~60% major-appliance share, 2024) restrict allocations and coop funds. Bulky-item last‑mile often >50% of delivery cost and appliance e‑com returns ~20% (2024), raising reverse‑logistics and service CAPEX. Scale (Best Buy $47.26B FY2024) and review/SEO lead to a strong incumbency advantage.
| Metric | Value (2024) |
|---|---|
| CAC | $40–$120 |
| E‑com conversion | ~2% |
| OEM share | ~60% |
| Appliance returns | ~20% |
| Best Buy revenue | $47.26B |