HEI Bundle
Who owns Hawaiian Electric Industries?
Who holds control of Hawaiian Electric Industries after the 2023 Maui wildfires and market shifts? HEI is a publicly traded holding company (NYSE: HE) combining Hawaiian Electric Company and American Savings Bank; institutional investors own a substantial portion of the float.
HEI’s ownership includes public shareholders, major institutional holders, and a board overseeing utility and bank operations; market cap ranged in the low- to mid-$1 billions in 2024–2025, with regulators and investors closely watching governance and liability exposure. See HEI Porter's Five Forces Analysis
Who Founded HEI?
Founders and Early Ownership of Hawaiian Electric Industries trace back to Hawaiian Electric Company, established in Honolulu in 1891 to centralize electric power for Oahu and later other islands; early ownership reflected local civic leaders and business backers rather than a modern venture cap table.
Promoters and civic leaders founded HECO in 1891 to provide centralized electricity to Honolulu and surrounding communities.
Early shareholders were predominantly Hawaii-based merchants, investors and civic figures supporting infrastructure development.
Detailed share-by-share founder splits from the 1890s are not disclosed in modern SEC filings or company reports.
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. was formed in 1981 as a holding company; initial ownership mirrored legacy HECO shareholders transitioning into the parent entity.
In the late 1980s American Savings Bank entered HEI’s portfolio, combining regulated utility exposure with a Hawaii-focused banking business.
Early governance was shaped by utility regulation and banking oversight; ownership prioritized reliability and regulated returns over startup-style founder arrangements.
Ownership in the formative decades was dominated by Hawaii-based shareholder groups and long-term utility investors; for contemporary ownership, institutional holdings and investor disclosures as of 2024–2025 can be found in HEI's SEC filings and proxy statements, and further strategic context appears in this company review: Growth Strategy of HEI
Founding and early ownership characteristics relevant to who owns HEI Company and HEI Company ownership history and founders.
- Founded as Hawaiian Electric Company in 1891 in Honolulu by local promoters and civic leaders.
- Holding company Hawaiian Electric Industries formed in 1981 via reorganization of legacy HECO shareholders.
- American Savings Bank became part of HEI in the late 1980s, diversifying ownership exposure.
- Early control reflected Hawaii-based shareholders and regulated-utility investors; no modern-style founder vesting or startup buyouts are documented in SEC filings.
HEI SWOT Analysis
- Complete SWOT Breakdown
- Fully Customizable
- Editable in Excel & Word
- Professional Formatting
- Investor-Ready Format
How Has HEI’s Ownership Changed Over Time?
Key events reshaping who owns HEI Company include the 1980s shift to a holding-company model that folded in American Savings Bank (ASB), broadening public-market ownership; index inclusions and rising institutionalization in the 2000s–2010s; and the post-August 2023 Maui wildfire value shock, dividend suspension, and litigation-driven investor rotation through 2024–2025.
| Period | Ownership Trends | Notable Stakeholders / Effects |
|---|---|---|
| 1981–1990s | Transition to holding company; diversification via ASB; listing broadened mainland institutional base | Regulated utility assets consolidated; rising mainland mutual funds and regional banks as holders |
| 2000s–2010s | Institutional ownership concentration increased; index and dividend funds became top holders | Major passive managers (Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street) appear among top holders; insiders well under 5% |
| 2023–2025 | Equity value decline after Maui wildfires; dividend suspended Aug 2023; litigation priced in; retail volatility rose | Top shareholders remain large U.S. institutions; aggregated passive holders often control a meaningful double-digit percentage; active/distressed funds engaged |
As of the latest 2024–2025 filings, the share register for HEI Company is dominated by index funds and large U.S. institutional investors, with The Vanguard Group, BlackRock, and State Street commonly listed among top holders; insider and director stakes remain low, typically below 5%.
Concentrated institutional ownership and post-wildfire litigation reshaped governance and strategic options around ASB and balance-sheet fixes.
- Index funds support one-share-one-vote continuity
- Active and special-situations managers push for liability clarity and securitization pathways
- Dividend suspension (Aug 2023) elevated cost-of-capital and refinancing concerns
- Retail ownership rose during 2024–2025 volatility
For a focused company profile and strategic context, see Marketing Strategy of HEI
HEI PESTLE Analysis
- Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
- No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
- Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
- Instant Download, Ready to Use
- 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Who Sits on HEI’s Board?
HEI’s board in 2025 is majority independent, with the CEO serving as a director; board composition and committee leadership reflect the company’s regulated utility and banking exposures and emphasize safety, risk oversight, and capital allocation.
| Director | Role on Board | Independence / Committee Leadership |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Executive Officer | Director | Executive director; serves on executive committee |
| Independent Chair or Lead Director | Board Chair / Lead | Independent; chairs nominating/governance |
| Audit Committee Chair | Audit Committee | Independent; financial expertise |
| Compensation Committee Chair | Compensation Committee | Independent; oversees executive pay |
| Safety / Risk Oversight Director | Risk / Safety Oversight | Independent; focuses on wildfire and utility resilience |
HEI operates a one-share-one-vote structure with no SEC-disclosed dual-class shares or golden share; voting power accrues to shareholders of record, where institutional investors and index funds constitute the largest voting blocs.
Independent board leadership and committee chairs align with public-company norms; institutional shareholders exert influence mainly through proxy voting and engagement.
- One-share-one-vote structure; no special voting class disclosed
- Majority independent board, CEO sits on the board
- 2024–2025 governance focus: wildfire risk, capital allocation, utility safety, ASB strategic role
- Proxy/activist pressure centered on liability management, securitization, and strategic alternatives
Institutional ownership drives HEI Company ownership patterns: large passive index funds and active managers appear among HEI shareholders, while no single shareholder is disclosed with outsized control; for further context see Competitors Landscape of HEI.
HEI Business Model Canvas
- Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
- Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
- Investor-Ready BMC Format
- 100% Editable and Customizable
- Clear and Structured Layout
What Recent Changes Have Shaped HEI’s Ownership Landscape?
Ownership of HEI Company shifted materially from 2023–2025 as litigation-driven risk repricing and dividend suspension prompted active repositioning among investors; passive index holders remained sizable while value and special-situations funds increased stakes amid debate over separating American Savings Bank.
| Topic | 2023–2025 Developments | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend policy | Dividend suspended in August 2023 and remained suspended through 2024–2025 pending liability clarity and regulatory recovery mechanisms | Reduced demand from income funds; heightened event risk |
| Liquidity & insurance | Progress on insurance recovery and liquidity actions; monitoring of Hawaii securitization legislation | Potential for ratepayer-funded recovery via securitization; balance-sheet relief if approved |
| Strategic review | Market focus on American Savings Bank (ASB) as source of value or separation optionality; no separation completed by 2025 | Separation could ring-fence utility risk and shift ownership mix |
| Investor base | Institutional turnover: income funds exited post-suspension; special-situations and value investors added; index funds stayed core | Higher concentration among institutional holders; more activist engagement likely |
| Industry trends | More securitization of catastrophe costs; greater investor emphasis on safety, vegetation management, grid hardening | Regulatory and shareholder pressure on operational risk mitigation |
Investors tracking who owns HEI Company have prioritized litigation outcomes, regulatory recovery paths, and ASB-related options as determinants of HEI Company ownership and future board and shareholder composition.
Dividend halted in August 2023 to conserve liquidity; reinstatement tied to liability resolution and potential securitization approvals.
Post-suspension exits by income-focused funds contrasted with inflows from special-situations and value managers; passive index holders stayed largely unchanged.
Hawaii legislative and regulatory discussions in 2024–2025 centered on securitization frameworks to recover wildfire costs from ratepayers, influencing creditor and investor expectations.
Analysts highlighted American Savings Bank as a material asset for value realization or separation, affecting projections for HEI Company owner structure and potential capital transactions.
HEI Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
- Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
- 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
- Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
- Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
- What is Brief History of HEI Company?
- What is Competitive Landscape of HEI Company?
- What is Growth Strategy and Future Prospects of HEI Company?
- How Does HEI Company Work?
- What is Sales and Marketing Strategy of HEI Company?
- What are Mission Vision & Core Values of HEI Company?
- What is Customer Demographics and Target Market of HEI Company?
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.