Who Owns BigCommerce Company?

BigCommerce Bundle

Get Full Bundle:

	5 FORCES	$15	$10
	BCG	$15	$10
	CANVAS	$15	$10
	4P's MIX	$15	$10
	PESTLE	$15	$10
	SWOT	$15	$10

TOTAL:

ADD TO CART

Who controls BigCommerce today?

When BigCommerce debuted on Nasdaq (BIGC) on August 5, 2020, its market debut more than doubled, raising questions about who steers the company's strategic direction as it scales in a crowded ecommerce market.

Today BigCommerce is a U.S.-listed public company with institutional investors holding the largest stakes, while founder and insider ownership has fallen since its venture-backed growth and IPO.

See an industry-focused product analysis: BigCommerce Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Founders and Early Ownership of the company traces to 2009 when Eddie Machaalani and Mitchell Harper co-founded BigCommerce after collaborating on Interspire; initial equity was held almost entirely by the two founders with small allocations to early Interspire employees, and formal public cap table percentages from inception were not disclosed.

Founding team

Eddie Machaalani and Mitchell Harper co-founded the company in 2009 after earlier work on Interspire.

Initial equity split

Founders held the vast majority of equity, roughly split between them; small grants went to transitioning Interspire employees.

Early angels

Friends-and-family and angel investors participated before venture capital entry in 2011.

2011 Series A

Series A in 2011 led by General Catalyst with Floodgate joined institutional investors and formalized vesting and protective provisions.

Vesting terms

New option grants followed standard 4-year vesting with 1-year cliffs for options issued around the Series A period.

Founders’ dilution

Founder equity declined over successive rounds consistent with market norms as institutional investors increased stakes.

By institutionalization in 2011 founders still controlled a majority of voting power; over subsequent financing and eventual public listing events, active founder influence on governance diminished as both co-founders transitioned out of day-to-day roles.

Key facts and timeline

Founders and early ownership milestones that shaped BigCommerce’s cap table and governance.

• Company founded in 2009 by Eddie Machaalani and Mitchell Harper; initial equity largely held by the two founders.
• Pre-2011 included friends-and-family and angel participants before institutional rounds.
• 2011 Series A led by General Catalyst with Floodgate and others institutionalized ownership and introduced standard 4-year vesting with 1-year cliffs.
• Protective provisions (ROFR, co-sale) and structured vesting were included; founder stakes were diluted in later financings and as founders stepped back from daily management.

For related detail on business model and revenue mix that influenced investor interest and subsequent ownership shifts see Revenue Streams & Business Model of BigCommerce

BigCommerce SWOT Analysis

• Complete SWOT Breakdown
• Fully Customizable
• Editable in Excel & Word
• Professional Formatting
• Investor-Ready Format

GET TEMPLATE ➔

Key events shaping BigCommerce ownership include early VC rounds (2011–2013), a SoftBank-led growth round in 2015, the August 5, 2020 IPO that converted preferred shares and broadened the public float, and post‑2020 public‑market re‑rating that shifted holdings toward large U.S. institutions and passive funds.

Strategic consequences included a shift toward enterprise accounts, partner ecosystems, profitability discipline, and a board dominated by independent operators and investor representatives, with strengthened audit, compensation and governance committees.

Ownership snapshot and implications

Who owns BigCommerce today is primarily U.S. institutional investors; no single entity controls the company and public float is substantial.

• Top institutional holders typically include Vanguard Group and BlackRock complexes as of 2024–2025 filings
• Founder and legacy VC stakes are now small; venture firms reduced positions after IPO and secondary sales
• Public-company governance follows one‑share‑one‑vote norms with oversight from large passive and active managers
• For deeper context on strategy and market positioning, see Marketing Strategy of BigCommerce

BigCommerce PESTLE Analysis

• Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
• No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
• Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
• Instant Download, Ready to Use
• 100% Editable, Fully Customizable

GET TEMPLATE ➔

As of 2024–2025 the BigCommerce board is majority independent, combining enterprise software, payments and ecommerce expertise with the CEO and a small number of investor-affiliated members; independent directors chair key committees and seats tied to early investors have rotated as funds trimmed stakes.

The company maintains a one-share-one-vote capital structure with no dual-class stock, no golden share and no reported founder super-voting rights in proxy filings through 2024–2025; voting power therefore tracks ownership and institutional holders and index funds exert outsized influence.

Board composition and voting influence

Independent-majority board, executive presence, and proportional voting by shareholders shape governance and capital-allocation debates.

• Board majority independent with software, payments, ecommerce expertise
• One-share-one-vote — no dual-class or founder super-voting (proxy filings 2024–2025)
• Seats linked to early investors have rotated as institutions trimmed stakes
• Index and active managers drive outcomes on pay, auditors and director elections

Engagement has focused on profitability, operating leverage, and capital allocation as B2B and composable commerce growth re-accelerated; see a concise ownership overview in this Brief History of BigCommerce for context on founders, acquisition history and shareholder evolution.

BigCommerce Business Model Canvas

• Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
• Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
• Investor-Ready BMC Format
• 100% Editable and Customizable
• Clear and Structured Layout

GET TEMPLATE ➔

Post-pandemic index rebalancing and multiple compression from 2021–2023 increased passive ownership in BigCommerce, with managers from 2023–2025 shifting focus to operating efficiency and profitability metrics that attracted institutional support.

Secondary liquidity continued as early investors sold into the open market, incrementally increasing free float; management stated intent to remain independent, with no repurchase program, special dividend, privatization plan, or controlling‑stake sale announced through 2024–2025.

Institutional concentration

Analysts note the top 10 holders account for a large share of holdings, a pattern common in sub-$5B market‑cap software names and reflecting index and active institutional positions.

Secondary sales

Early VCs and pre‑IPO stakeholders reduced concentrated blocks through open‑market sales, improving liquidity but not creating a single majority owner.

Strategic M&A focus

M&A through 2024–2025 targeted product adjacencies and partnerships supporting composable commerce and Open SaaS adoption rather than ownership-changing takeovers.

Governance and control

Founder influence remains minimal; board and management emphasize independence with no announced plans to privatize or accept a control bid through mid‑2025.

For further context on market positioning and competitive dynamics that affect BigCommerce ownership, see Competitors Landscape of BigCommerce

BigCommerce Porter's Five Forces Analysis

• Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
• Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
• 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
• Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
• Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked

GET TEMPLATE ➔