Workiva Bundle
Who owns Workiva today?
Workiva, founded in 2008 as WebFilings and public since its December 2014 IPO, shifted from founder-led control to a widely held institutional base. The company now offers a cloud platform for connected reporting across financial, ESG, and risk domains.
Institutional investors and public shareholders dominate the cap table, while insiders and founders retain influence through direct holdings and board seats; revenue topped an annualized run-rate above $700,000,000 in 2024–2025. See Workiva Porter's Five Forces Analysis for strategic context.
Who Founded Workiva?
Founders and Early Ownership of Workiva centered on a tight, founder-led team formed in 2008 when Matthew M. Rizai, Martin J. Vanderploeg, Daniel J. Murray, and Joseph P. Howell spun out from Engineering Animation Inc.; equity stayed concentrated among them and close insiders during the seed stage, with limited outside VC participation.
Rizai led strategy and served as early Chairman/CEO; Vanderploeg drove product and later became CEO then Executive Chairman.
Murray and Howell supplied engineering, operations and accounting/reporting domain expertise from prior EAI experience.
Precise early equity splits were not publicly disclosed; ownership was concentrated among founders and former EAI colleagues rather than broad VC syndicates.
Early operations emphasized capital-efficient product development for regulated reporting markets, supporting tight insider control.
Governance reflected typical Delaware C‑corp founder protections: concentrated decision rights, founder vesting and transfer restrictions.
Founder transitions and professionalization occurred later and were structured as the company prepared for IPO and broader shareholder base.
Early founder-centric ownership set the stage for later public ownership dynamics; see Mission, Vision & Core Values of Workiva for context on cultural evolution.
The following items clarify early ownership dynamics and relevance to current Workiva ownership questions.
- Who owns Workiva: initially the four founders and close insiders dominated seed-stage equity.
- Workiva ownership concentrated: founders + former EAI colleagues rather than large seed VCs.
- Workiva shareholders: expanded post-IPO to include institutional investors and mutual funds; founder stakes diluted over time.
- Insider ownership and governance: transitions were orderly, with no widely reported early disputes as the company professionalized.
Workiva SWOT Analysis
- Complete SWOT Breakdown
- Fully Customizable
- Editable in Excel & Word
- Professional Formatting
- Investor-Ready Format
How Has Workiva’s Ownership Changed Over Time?
Key events shaping Workiva ownership include the December 2014 NYSE IPO at $14 per share, progressive institutionalization from 2015–2020 as the platform expanded beyond SEC reporting, and a 2021–2025 era where passive and active managers became dominant holders while insider stakes declined in percentage terms.
| Period | Ownership Trend | Notable Effects |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 IPO | Broadening to institutional investors; meaningful insider lockups | Raised ~$100M; initial market cap ~$600–700M |
| 2015–2020 | Institutionalization via index inclusion and mutual funds | Insider percentages diluted by secondary liquidity and option exercises |
| 2021–2025 | Dominant institutional ownership; dispersed public float | Top-10 shareholders hold a substantial portion of float; governance aligned with mid-cap SaaS norms |
Institutional investors, typically large passive managers and growth-focused funds, appear repeatedly in SEC filings as top holders; founders and executives retain meaningful but non-controlling stakes disclosed in proxy statements, and ownership dynamics have supported strategic moves into ESG, GRC, and international expansion while preserving Rule-of-40 discipline.
Institutional investors dominate the shareholder register, with top passive managers and active growth funds among leading holders; insider ownership is modest but present.
- Top-10 holders typically hold a large share of the free float
- Common large holders in filings include Vanguard and BlackRock
- Founders/executives hold material but non-controlling stakes per proxy
- Index inclusion and mutual funds increased liquidity and diversification post-IPO
For detailed context on company revenue models that influenced investor interest, see Revenue Streams & Business Model of Workiva; for up-to-date percentages and the current top-10 shareholders list consult the latest 13F filings, Form 4 disclosures, and the annual proxy statement filed with the SEC for 2024–2025 data.
Workiva PESTLE Analysis
- Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
- No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
- Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
- Instant Download, Ready to Use
- 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Who Sits on Workiva’s Board?
As of 2025 the Workiva board blends founders and independent directors with expertise in software, finance, audit and governance; Executive Chair Martin J. Vanderploeg and CEO Julie Iskow (appointed 2023) serve on the board alongside independent chairs of audit, compensation and nominating/governance committees, with voting power tied to one‑share, one‑vote common stock.
| Name | Role | Relevant Expertise |
|---|---|---|
| Martin J. Vanderploeg | Executive Chair | Co‑founder, product and strategy |
| Julie Iskow | Chief Executive Officer, Director | Former President/COO, SaaS operations |
| Independent Director A | Audit Committee Chair | Public accounting, SOX compliance |
| Independent Director B | Compensation Committee Chair | Executive compensation, HR |
| Independent Director C | Nominating & Governance Chair | Corporate governance, board oversight |
Workiva maintains a single‑class common stock structure with no disclosed dual‑class or supervoting shares; voting power equals economic ownership, and institutional investors collectively exert significant influence through annual director elections and say‑on‑pay votes.
Board control follows share ownership; no controlling shareholder has been reported, and engagement focuses on pay, ESG and growth versus profitability tradeoffs.
- One‑share, one‑vote common stock: voting tied to economic ownership
- Institutional investors (e.g., mutual funds, asset managers) hold a majority of public float—collective influence in elections
- No widely reported proxy fights or activist‑led board turnovers through 2025
- Executive insiders (cofounder and CEO) participate on board but do not have special voting rights
For further context on strategy and governance read Growth Strategy of Workiva.
Workiva Business Model Canvas
- Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
- Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
- Investor-Ready BMC Format
- 100% Editable and Customizable
- Clear and Structured Layout
What Recent Changes Have Shaped Workiva’s Ownership Landscape?
Between 2019 and 2025 Workiva ownership shifted toward greater institutionalization, with passive index funds and large active managers increasing positions as the company expanded beyond SEC reporting into ESG, audit, and risk products; insider ownership as a share of diluted common stock declined modestly due to equity compensation and secondary liquidity while founders and executives retained performance-aligned stakes.
| Period | Ownership Trend | Notable Drivers |
|---|---|---|
| 2019–2021 | Growing institutional and passive ownership | Expansion of platform into non-SEC use cases; ARR growth |
| 2022–2023 | Stable institutional base; insider stake trending lower | Leadership change to Julie Iskow (2023); ongoing equity comp |
| 2024–2025 | Broad non-controlling institutional holders; limited buybacks | Focus on operating investment, net revenue retention strength |
Institutional ownership rose to an estimated range of 55–70% of float by 2025 with top passive holders such as index ETFs and large asset managers among the largest shareholders; insider ownership declined to roughly 5–12% of diluted shares depending on disclosure date, while insider alignment is maintained via performance-based awards and restricted equity.
Institutional investors account for the majority of free float; passive funds and active growth managers both increased exposure as Workiva broadened its product set and ARR profile.
Insider percentage of diluted shares declined through ongoing equity awards and secondary sales, though founders and executives retain meaningful performance-linked incentives.
One-share-one-vote governance remained intact through 2025; capital allocation prioritized operating investment and modest repurchases aimed at offsetting dilution rather than large buybacks.
Industry trends of rising passive ownership, emphasis on board independence and ESG, and selective activist interest shape how Workiva shareholders engage with management and the board.
Leadership shifts—Vanderploeg to CEO in 2018 with Rizai as Executive Chairman, then Julie Iskow to CEO in 2023 with Vanderploeg as Executive Chairman—preserved founder stewardship while professionalizing management, and as of 2025 management commentary and analyst reports point to broad, non-controlling institutional ownership with no announced plans for dual-class shares, spin-offs, or take-private transactions; see a compact corporate timeline in the Brief History of Workiva.
Workiva Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
- Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
- 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
- Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
- Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
- What is Brief History of Workiva Company?
- What is Competitive Landscape of Workiva Company?
- What is Growth Strategy and Future Prospects of Workiva Company?
- How Does Workiva Company Work?
- What is Sales and Marketing Strategy of Workiva Company?
- What are Mission Vision & Core Values of Workiva Company?
- What is Customer Demographics and Target Market of Workiva Company?
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.