Who Owns Veeva Systems Company?

Veeva Systems Bundle

Get Full Bundle:

	5 FORCES	$15	$10
	BCG	$15	$10
	CANVAS	$15	$10
	4P's MIX	$15	$10
	PESTLE	$15	$10
	SWOT	$15	$10

TOTAL:

ADD TO CART

Who owns Veeva Systems?

Who controls Veeva Systems and how concentrated is ownership after its 2013 IPO and years of growth? This looks at founder stakes, major institutional holders, and voting control at the Pleasanton‑based life sciences cloud leader.

Veeva’s founder‑CEO maintains a significant stake while large institutions (Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street) hold major passive positions; the company uses a single‑class, one‑share‑one‑vote structure and serves top biopharma customers with subscription revenue and high retention. See Veeva Systems Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Founders and Early Ownership of Veeva Systems traces to 2007 when Peter P. Gassner led formation with Matthew J. Wallach and Mark L. Wolff; Gassner was the principal founder and largest equity holder, while Wallach and Wolff held smaller, role‑aligned stakes and standard four‑year vesting applied.

Principal Founder

Peter P. Gassner served as CEO and held the largest founding stake, reflecting IP leadership and operational control.

Co‑Founders

Matthew J. Wallach and Mark L. Wolff held smaller equity allocations tied to product and go‑to‑market roles.

Early Capital

Funding was modest relative to typical SaaS; friends‑and‑family and strategic angels provided seed support, preserving founder ownership.

Salesforce Relationship

Salesforce acted as an early platform partner via Force.com but is not recorded as an equity owner.

Equity Terms

Founder and early employee grants typically used four‑year vesting with a one‑year cliff and included ROFR and co‑sale rights in shareholder agreements.

Pre‑IPO Ownership

Veeva grew efficiently with limited venture rounds, helping founders retain meaningful post‑IPO equity exposure and voting influence.

Early governance showed no public major founder disputes; Wallach later transitioned toward board roles and executed measured post‑IPO sales under Rule 10b5‑1 while remaining aligned to long‑term value; for background on company purpose see Mission, Vision & Core Values of Veeva Systems.

Key Early Ownership Facts

Concise ownership and structural points relevant to Veeva shareholders and those asking who owns Veeva Systems.

• Principal founder: Peter P. Gassner held the largest founding stake and served as CEO at inception.
• Co‑founders: Matthew J. Wallach and Mark L. Wolff held smaller, role‑aligned equity positions.
• Seed investors: Friends‑and‑family and strategic angels participated; venture capital involvement was modest pre‑IPO.
• Equity mechanics: Standard four‑year vesting with one‑year cliff, ROFR and co‑sale provisions applied to early agreements.

Veeva Systems SWOT Analysis

• Complete SWOT Breakdown
• Fully Customizable
• Editable in Excel & Word
• Professional Formatting
• Investor-Ready Format

GET TEMPLATE ➔

Key events shaping Veeva Systems ownership include the October 16, 2013 IPO, steady index inclusions from 2014–2021, pandemic‑era acceleration of ARR (2020–2022) that drew institutional interest, and a SaaS re‑rating with market‑cap around $30–$35 billion by mid‑2025.

Current public ownership is dominated by institutional and index holders, with insiders—led by founder Peter Gassner—retaining material but reduced percentages; no government, corporate parent, or private‑equity control exists.

Ownership snapshot and governance implications

Major shareholders and ownership trends shape governance, voting outcomes, and strategic engagement at Veeva Systems in 2024–2025.

• Institutional/index ownership commonly exceeds 75%, with Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street typically among the largest holders
• Active managers often include T. Rowe Price, Capital Group, Wellington, and Fidelity (each mid‑single‑digit percentages typical)
• Founder Peter Gassner remains the largest individual shareholder with mid‑single‑digit ownership worth billions; other insiders hold fractional percentages
• The lack of dual‑class shares means no single controlling shareholder; index ownership increases focus on say‑on‑pay and ESG votes

For shareholder registry details, 13F filings and institutional holdings lists provide the latest breakouts; see related analysis on Revenue Streams & Business Model of Veeva Systems for contextual business drivers influencing ownership.

Veeva Systems PESTLE Analysis

• Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
• No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
• Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
• Instant Download, Ready to Use
• 100% Editable, Fully Customizable

GET TEMPLATE ➔

Veeva Systems' board blends founder leadership with independent expertise; as of 2025 the board includes founder‑CEO Peter P. Gassner as chair, co‑founder Matthew J. Wallach, former CFO Timothy S. Cabral, and independent directors drawn from enterprise software, life sciences and audit backgrounds, supporting stable governance and shareholder accountability.

Veeva maintains a one‑share‑one‑vote common stock structure with no dual‑class or super‑voting shares; major institutional holders such as Vanguard and BlackRock (per 13F filings through 2025) hold large economic stakes but no special voting rights, and directors are elected annually by shareholders.

Board composition and voting

Board makeup emphasizes founder continuity plus independent expertise; voting follows equal‑share principles and annual elections.

• One‑share‑one‑vote common stock; no dual‑class or golden shares
• Founders are significant economic holders but lack super‑voting rights
• Institutional holders are large investors; directors are not appointed by them
• Proxy activity has been limited; shareholder proposals focus on comp, board refreshment, and ESG

For context on market positioning and investor interest see Target Market of Veeva Systems; refer to 2025 13F and DEF 14A filings for up‑to‑date details on Veeva shareholders, Veeva insider ownership, and the largest Veeva investors.

Veeva Systems Business Model Canvas

• Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
• Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
• Investor-Ready BMC Format
• 100% Editable and Customizable
• Clear and Structured Layout

GET TEMPLATE ➔

Institutional ownership of Veeva Systems increased from 2021–2025 as passive S&P 500 indexation and inflows to Vanguard, BlackRock and State Street grew, modestly diluting insider stakes while founders and executives retained meaningful positions; insider ownership fell as a percentage but remained similar in absolute dollar value.

Analyst consensus through mid‑2025 expects ownership to remain broadly institutional with incremental founder dilution from ongoing equity compensation; no signals point to privatization, dual‑class adoption or emergence of a controlling shareholder, and governance remains one‑share‑one‑vote.

Institutional holders scale

Vanguard, BlackRock and State Street are the largest Veeva institutional holders, collectively owning roughly ~28% by 2025; 13F filings show passive inflows since 2021 increased S&P‑linked ownership.

Insider selling patterns

Executives, including founders, used scheduled 10b5‑1 plans for diversification and tax planning; percentage ownership drifted lower but absolute holdings in dollars remained aligned with wealth management goals.

Capital allocation stance

Through 2024–2025 Veeva emphasized reinvestment into product expansion over material buybacks or dividends; modest headcount and equity‑based compensation increased share count slightly.

Ownership outlook

Expect institutional holders to remain dominant, founder stake to dilute incrementally via compensation, and any future secondary or M&A actions sized to preserve index eligibility and founder alignment; see related analysis in Marketing Strategy of Veeva Systems.

Veeva Systems Porter's Five Forces Analysis

• Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
• Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
• 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
• Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
• Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked

GET TEMPLATE ➔