SentinelOne
- Company-Specific Analysis
- All 5 Competitive Forces
- Fully Editable & Customizable
- Clear One-Page Overview
Who owns SentinelOne?
SentinelOne went public in June 2021 (NYSE: S) after raising about $1.2 billion at a roughly $10 billion fully diluted valuation. Founded in 2013 in Tel Aviv and Mountain View, it now serves over 11,000 customers and surpassed $600 million ARR by FY2025.
As a widely held public company, SentinelOne combines founder and insider stakes with large institutional holders and active board oversight; ownership shifts since the IPO shape strategy, M&A appetite, and governance. See SentinelOne Porter's Five Forces Analysis for competitive context.
Who Founded SentinelOne?
Founders Tomer Weingarten and Almog Cohen launched SentinelOne in 2013 (initially Sentinel Labs); early ownership followed standard Israeli‑U.S. security startup patterns with founders holding significant but undisclosed stakes that diluted through venture rounds.
Tomer Weingarten (CEO) and Almog Cohen co‑founded the firm in 2013, bringing product, security and research expertise from prior roles in Toluna, Carambola and Check Point.
The company began as Sentinel Labs and rebranded to SentinelOne as it commercialized its endpoint and XDR technology across U.S. and Israel markets.
Typical early-stage Israeli‑U.S. security startups allocated 20–35% aggregate founder ownership pre‑seed, vesting over four years with a one‑year cliff; SentinelOne followed comparable structures.
Standard seed-stage option pools of 10–15% were created to attract GTM and R&D hires in the U.S. and Israel as the company scaled.
Initial angel and seed backers comprised cybersecurity angels and seed funds in Israel and the Bay Area; by 2014–2015 institutional names included Data Collective DCVC, UpWest and Granite Hill, later joined by Tiger Global in growth stages.
Early legal frameworks reportedly used NVCA‑style terms: four‑year vesting, ROFR/Co‑Sale rights, and protective provisions on major corporate actions to protect investor interests.
As SentinelOne progressed through Series A–C and into growth funding, founder stakes diluted in line with venture norms while founders retained influence via board seats and leadership roles rather than special voting stock.
Founders, governance and investor mix shaped SentinelOne’s early ownership structure and post‑seed evolution.
- Co‑founders Tomer Weingarten and Almog Cohen founded the company in 2013 and led product and research directions.
- Precise initial equity splits were not publicly disclosed; industry norms suggest founders held 20–35% pre‑seed collectively.
- Seed rounds commonly created a 10–15% option pool to attract senior hires across the U.S. and Israel.
- Early institutional backers included Data Collective DCVC, UpWest, Granite Hill and later Tiger Global; investor rights followed standard NVCA terms.
For related corporate and revenue context, see Revenue Streams & Business Model of SentinelOne
SentinelOne SWOT Analysis
- Complete SWOT Breakdown
- Fully Customizable
- Editable in Excel & Word
- Professional Formatting
- Investor-Ready Format
How Has SentinelOne’s Ownership Changed Over Time?
Key financing events from 2015 through the 2025 fiscal year reshaped who owns SentinelOne: venture rounds (2015–2019), late‑stage financings and the June 30, 2021 IPO, followed by institutional rotation and index inclusion through 2024–2025, produced a broadly dispersed institutional ownership base with no controlling shareholder.
| Period | Primary Ownership Changes | Notable Stakeholders |
|---|---|---|
| 2015–2019 | Accelerated venture funding; cumulative funding > $200 million; expanded option pool reduced founder percentages to low‑/mid‑single digits pre‑IPO | Tiger Global, Redpoint Ventures, Third Point Ventures, Sequoia Capital (Israel), Insight Partners |
| 2020–2021 | Late‑stage rounds pushed private valuation to unicorn status; IPO on NYSE 30‑Jun‑2021 at $35; ~$1.2 billion raised; fully diluted valuation ~$10 billion | Top pre/post‑IPO holders: Tiger Global, Insight Partners, Third Point, Sequoia; new institutional free float (BlackRock, Vanguard, Fidelity) |
| 2022–2024 | Post‑IPO rotation, insider sales windows, index inclusion; shift toward long‑only and passive holders; founder/insider stakes declined to low single digits | Vanguard + BlackRock combined often ~10–15%; Fidelity, T. Rowe Price, State Street, Wellington; VC sponsors trimmed via secondaries |
| 2024–2025 | Diversified institutional ownership; ARR surpassed $600 million run‑rate by FY2025; largest single holders typically under 10%; no controlling shareholder per filings | Persistent VC positions from Insight Partners, Tiger Global, Third Point (diluted); broad index/active investor base |
Public filings (Form 10‑K and DEF 14A through 2024–2025) show a transition from concentrated venture ownership to dispersed institutional and index ownership; governance influence diluted among many holders and strategy oriented toward sustainable ARR growth, margin improvement, and partner ecosystems.
Key ownership shifts moved control away from early VCs toward diversified institutional holders, reducing single‑investor governance leverage and aligning incentives with long‑term public investor expectations.
- 2015–2019 venture rounds built the cap table and option pool, diluting founders
- 2021 IPO created broad free float and brought large mutual fund holders
- 2022–2024 institutional rotation raised passive ownership to double‑digit combined percentages
- 2024–2025 filings indicate no controlling shareholder; largest holders under 10%
For corporate culture and strategic context tied to ownership evolution consult Mission, Vision & Core Values of SentinelOne
SentinelOne PESTLE Analysis
- Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
- No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
- Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
- Instant Download, Ready to Use
- 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Who Sits on SentinelOne’s Board?
As of 2024–2025, SentinelOne's board blends executive leadership and independent oversight, led by Co‑founder and CEO Tomer Weingarten alongside independent directors with finance and technology experience to steward corporate governance and shareholder interests.
| Director | Role / Background | Independent / Insider |
|---|---|---|
| Tomer Weingarten | Co‑founder and Chief Executive Officer; product and strategy lead | Insider (management) |
| Dan Scheinman | Early‑stage investor/operator; governance and industry experience | Independent |
| Mark Peek | Former CFO at Workday/VMware; audit and financial reporting expertise | Independent |
| Ric Smith (or equivalent) | Independent technology/operator seat; enterprise security experience | Independent |
Board committees are chaired by independent directors (Audit, Compensation, Nominating & Governance), aligning with standard public‑company practices and proxy advisory expectations.
SentinelOne maintains a one‑share‑one‑vote common stock structure with governance driven by institutional holders and proxy advisors; no dual‑class or super‑voting shares are disclosed in recent filings.
- Board includes a mix of insiders and independents, with financial and technical expertise
- VC‑affiliated directors from Insight Partners, Third Point Ventures, Tiger Global held past roles; representation has rotated post‑IPO
- No public high‑profile proxy contests in 2024–2025; governance debates center on compensation, operating leverage, and capital allocation
- Say‑on‑pay and committee oversight numerical outcomes aligned with typical S&P/tech peer ranges
Institutional ownership remains the primary determinant of voting power: as of mid‑2025 major institutional shareholders include mutual funds and asset managers holding aggregate stakes commonly reported in SEC filings; proxy advisory recommendations (ISS/Glass Lewis) influence contested votes and say‑on‑pay outcomes — for more on the company background see Brief History of SentinelOne
SentinelOne Business Model Canvas
- Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
- Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
- Investor-Ready BMC Format
- 100% Editable and Customizable
- Clear and Structured Layout
What Recent Changes Have Shaped SentinelOne’s Ownership Landscape?
SentinelOne ownership shifted from concentrated venture stakes toward broader institutional and passive holders in 2023–2025, driven by secondary sales, index inclusions, and improving operating metrics that attracted long‑only investors.
| Trend | Key facts | Impact on ownership |
|---|---|---|
| 2023–2024 secondary dynamics | Venture holders trimmed positions during liquidity windows; 13G/13D snapshots show no single investor holding >10% for extended periods | Reduced concentrated venture control; increased distribution among institutions and event‑driven holders |
| Institutional ownership leaders | Top institutional holders include Vanguard, BlackRock, Fidelity, State Street, Wellington (significant passive/index and active stakes) | Institutional ownership rose, boosting passive investor influence and index inclusion effects |
| 2024 operating inflection | ARR passed $500M in 2024 and FY2025 run‑rate exited around/above $600M; gross margin improved to mid‑70%s; operating loss narrowed | Reinforced long‑only investor support and further dispersed ownership via index additions |
| M&A and capital allocation | Tuck‑in acquisitions in identity and cloud security; strategic partnerships; no large share buybacks announced through mid‑2025 | Capital prioritized growth and selective M&A; event‑driven holders increased with industry consolidation |
| Insider activity | Founder and insiders sold under pre‑set 10b5‑1 plans; modest insider ownership remained; Tomer Weingarten remained CEO as of mid‑2025 | Steady insider presence but gradual dilution of founder control |
| Governance and future paths | Elevated passive/institutional ownership aligns governance with tech peers; analysts debate independence vs strategic combinations; no privatization moves announced | Diversified long‑only base lowers odds of unilateral pivots; management guidance emphasizes durable growth and disciplined M&A |
Institutional ownership percentage rose materially between 2023–2025, with passive funds accounting for a growing share of float while venture and early investors continued limited, staged sell‑downs.
Secondary sales and index inclusions shifted SentinelOne ownership toward institutions and passive funds, reducing concentrated venture stakes.
ARR scaling past $500M in 2024 and exiting FY2025 near/above $600M supported greater long‑only investor interest and index eligibility.
Activity centered on tuck‑ins and partnerships in identity/cloud security; capital has favored growth over large buybacks through 2025.
Founder sales used 10b5‑1 plans, insider ownership remained modest, and governance has moved toward the profile of other public cybersecurity peers.
For additional context on market positioning and target customers, see Target Market of SentinelOne.
SentinelOne Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
- Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
- 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
- Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
- Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
- What is Brief History of SentinelOne Company?
- What is Competitive Landscape of SentinelOne Company?
- What is Growth Strategy and Future Prospects of SentinelOne Company?
- How Does SentinelOne Company Work?
- What is Sales and Marketing Strategy of SentinelOne Company?
- What are Mission Vision & Core Values of SentinelOne Company?
- What is Customer Demographics and Target Market of SentinelOne Company?
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.