Phoenix Holdings Bundle
Who owns The Phoenix Holdings Ltd. now?
When The Phoenix Holdings Ltd. moved from Delek Group control to a U.S.-led private equity consortium in 2019, ownership shifted dramatically. Founded in 1949, the group now combines PE control with a broad institutional and public float, overseeing life, health, pensions and large AUM.
Ownership today centers on a private equity-led control bloc plus significant institutional and retail shareholders; board composition and voting agreements reflect that split. See further strategic context in Phoenix Holdings Porter's Five Forces Analysis.
Who Founded Phoenix Holdings?
Ha’Phoenix Insurance Co. Ltd. was founded in Tel Aviv in 1949 by a consortium typical of Israel’s early post‑independence financial sector, established to supply modern insurance for a fast‑growing economy. Over subsequent decades ownership consolidated, with the Hackmey family emerging as the principal controlling owners from the late 1970s onward.
Established in 1949 in Tel Aviv to support Israel’s post‑independence economic expansion; initial capital provided by a group of financial and commercial backers.
Ownership reflected concentrated holdings among principal investors with customary buy‑sell understandings and staged liquidity events over time.
By the late 1970s the Hackmey family had become synonymous with Phoenix’s stewardship and strategic direction across insurance lines.
Under family control the group expanded into life, general insurance and long‑term savings, creating the platform for a holding‑company structure.
Granular 1949 founder equity splits are not disclosed in modern filings; public records emphasize concentrated family control rather than founder‑by‑founder percentages.
Family control and capital allocation choices in late 20th century set the stage for the transition to broader corporate ownership and eventual public disclosures in the 2000s.
Control consolidation under the Hackmeys influenced governance, capital allocation and expansion pace; by the 1990s Phoenix had built diversified insurance and savings operations whose ownership evolution is documented in corporate filings and market reports, including this concise company overview: Brief History of Phoenix Holdings
Essential items to trace founders and early ownership and to link to current ownership records:
- Founding year: 1949; founded in Tel Aviv by a multi‑party financial consortium.
- Dominant family owner: Hackmey family control consolidated from the late 1970s.
- Structure evolution: expansion into life, general, and long‑term savings paved way for a holding company model by the 2000s.
- Public records: early founder equity splits are not itemized in contemporary filings; rely on historical registries, archived corporate minutes and securities filings for verification.
Phoenix Holdings SWOT Analysis
- Complete SWOT Breakdown
- Fully Customizable
- Editable in Excel & Word
- Professional Formatting
- Investor-Ready Format
How Has Phoenix Holdings’s Ownership Changed Over Time?
Key ownership events reshaped Phoenix Holdings from family control to corporate stewardship and then to a U.S.-led private equity consortium, driving capital-discipline, governance changes, and broader institutional and passive ownership by 2024–2025.
| Year / Phase | Major Stakeholders | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Delek Group (Yitzhak Tshuva) | Shift from Hackmey family to corporate-parent model; emphasis on scale and capital-market discipline |
| 2014–2017 | Delek sought buyers; proposed Chinese and other investors | Divestment attempts stalled amid regulatory and geopolitical scrutiny in Israel’s financial sector |
| 2019 | Centerbridge Partners & Gallatin Point Capital (PE consortium) | ~33% controlling stake acquired from Delek; governance reset toward efficiency and long-term savings growth |
| 2020–2022 | Institutional and passive holders grow | Inclusion in major indices increased passive ownership; expanded asset-management and digital capabilities; improved ROE through interest-rate cycle |
| 2023–2024 | PE consortium (reduced), Israeli pension/provident funds, mutual funds, global indexers | Secondary block sell-downs increased free float; broader shareholder base while PE group remained largest bloc |
Current (2024–2025) major stakeholders: the control group of Centerbridge and Gallatin Point remains the leading shareholder bloc, while Israeli long-term savings institutions, local funds/ETFs, and global index funds hold a significant share of the public float; insider and retail holdings also persist.
Key shifts: family → corporate → PE-led; index inclusion broadened passive ownership and liquidity on TASE.
- 2006: Delek acquisition initiated corporate-parent era
- 2019: PE consortium bought ~33%, resetting strategy
- 2023–2024: Block trades raised free float; institutions expanded holdings
- 2024–2025: Centerbridge & Gallatin remain largest bloc; institutions collectively hold much of remaining shares
For governance, shareholder filings and TA-125/TA-35 index reports through 2024 show persistent emphasis on solvency, risk-based pricing, dividends/buybacks, and transparency; see further context in this analysis: Growth Strategy of Phoenix Holdings
Phoenix Holdings PESTLE Analysis
- Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
- No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
- Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
- Instant Download, Ready to Use
- 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Who Sits on Phoenix Holdings’s Board?
The current board of directors of Phoenix Holdings combines independent directors and representatives aligned with the private-equity control group; independent chairs lead key committees while control-group designees focus on strategic oversight and capital-allocation decisions.
| Director Role | Affiliation | Key Committee |
|---|---|---|
| Independent Chair | Independent | Audit Committee |
| Independent Director | Independent | Risk Committee |
| Control-Group Designee | PE Control Group | Strategy / Remuneration Committee |
Board composition follows Israeli corporate governance norms for insurers, maintaining an independent-majority framework while preserving the control bloc’s strategic influence and compliance with regulator expectations on solvency and disclosures.
The company uses a one-share-one-vote structure on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange with no public dual-class or golden-share arrangements; shareholder channels include AGM votes on directors, compensation and capital plans.
- Voting structure: one-share-one-vote on TASE
- Independent directors chair audit, risk and remuneration
- Control-group designees provide strategic oversight and alignment
- Engagement focus 2022–2024: capital allocation, solvency, ESG and board refreshment
Shareholder influence is exercised via routine AGM voting, with no high-profile proxy contests reported 2022–2024; increasing weight of domestic institutional and passive investors affects governance dynamics and voting outcomes—see Mission, Vision & Core Values of Phoenix Holdings for related context.
Phoenix Holdings Business Model Canvas
- Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
- Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
- Investor-Ready BMC Format
- 100% Editable and Customizable
- Clear and Structured Layout
What Recent Changes Have Shaped Phoenix Holdings’s Ownership Landscape?
Recent years show a clear drift from concentrated private-equity control toward a larger public float for Phoenix Holdings, driven by secondary sell-downs in 2023–2024, rising institutional allocations and TA-35 index flows that raised market liquidity and diversified ownership.
| Topic | Key development | Impact (2023–2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary sell-downs | PE control group executed additional block trades in 2023–2024 | Enlarged free float; ~8–12% incremental public float per disclosed placements; increased ETF and pension holdings |
| Institutional accumulation | Israeli pension/provident managers and ETFs increased positions | Index-led flows (TA-35) and ETF issuance lifted passive ownership; institutional stake gains of several percentage points |
| Capital returns | Dividends and opportunistic buybacks amid higher investment income | Maintained regulatory solvency buffers; targeted ROE and solvency ratios consistent with Tier-1 insurer norms |
Secondary disposals were managed as orderly block trades to broaden ownership while preserving governance stability; no public moves toward dual-class shares or privatization emerged through mid-2025.
PE holders reduced concentration via block trades in 2023–2024, increasing free-float and enabling ETFs and pensions to accumulate shares tied to TA-35 flows.
With higher investment income and elevated rates, the company prioritized disciplined dividends and opportunistic buybacks while maintaining solvency buffers for a Tier-1 insurer.
Selective bolt-ons and digital, health and long-term savings partnerships supported AUM growth and diversified earnings amid market consolidation.
Between 2022–2025 institutional ownership rose across Israeli insurers; founders' residual influence diluted and activist focus sharpened on capital efficiency and governance transparency.
Analyst commentary and company disclosures through 2024–2025 indicate continued normalization of the control group's stake via orderly placements, steady institutional accumulation, board refreshes, and a likely maintenance of a one-share-one-vote structure; for additional context see Target Market of Phoenix Holdings.
Phoenix Holdings Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
- Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
- 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
- Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
- Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
- What is Brief History of Phoenix Holdings Company?
- What is Competitive Landscape of Phoenix Holdings Company?
- What is Growth Strategy and Future Prospects of Phoenix Holdings Company?
- How Does Phoenix Holdings Company Work?
- What is Sales and Marketing Strategy of Phoenix Holdings Company?
- What are Mission Vision & Core Values of Phoenix Holdings Company?
- What is Customer Demographics and Target Market of Phoenix Holdings Company?
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.