Who Owns MongoDB Company?

MongoDB Bundle

Get Bundle
Get Full Bundle:
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10

TOTAL:

Who owns MongoDB today?

MongoDB shifted from a VC-backed startup to a public company after its 2017 NASDAQ IPO, driving growth with its document database and Atlas cloud service. Founders and institutional investors now share control within a single-class stock structure.

Who Owns MongoDB Company?

By FY2024–FY2025 MongoDB reached an annualized revenue run-rate above $2.28 billion, with Atlas contributing over 60% of revenue; ownership is mainly institutional, index funds, and insiders. See MongoDB Porter's Five Forces Analysis for strategic context.

Who Founded MongoDB?

Founders Dwight A. Merriman, Eliot Horowitz and Kevin P. Ryan launched MongoDB in 2007–2008; initial equity was concentrated among them with standard four-year vesting and one-year cliff, and early rounds brought institutional capital that materially diluted founder stakes.

Icon

Founding team roles

Merriman and Horowitz led product and engineering; Ryan provided executive and promoter experience.

Icon

Initial equity setup

Standard Silicon Valley vesting: 4-year schedule with a 1-year cliff and repurchase rights on departure.

Icon

Early investors

Seed and Series A included Union Square Ventures and Flybridge (then IDG Ventures Boston); later rounds added Sequoia, NEA, Red Hat and Intel Capital.

Icon

Preferred rounds impact

Staged preferred financings expanded capital but diluted founders into single-digit stakes by the public-company phase.

Icon

Governance and protections

Early preferred investors secured protective provisions and control levers typical for venture-backed growth companies.

Icon

Founder trajectories

Horowitz served as CTO through IPO and reduced operational role before leaving in 2020; Merriman and Ryan retained board/director roles and small equity positions thereafter.

Equity concentration at founding, followed by rounds from USV, Flybridge, Sequoia and NEA plus strategic investors, produced the public-company ownership mix that shifted major economic and voting power toward institutional shareholders and preferred holders ahead of IPO.

Icon

Key ownership facts

Founders, early investors and later institutions together shaped MongoDB's ownership and governance through dilution, preferred protections and board representation.

  • Founders: Merriman, Horowitz and Ryan held the largest initial blocks; Merriman and Horowitz had the largest technical founder shares.
  • Venture investors: Union Square Ventures and Flybridge participated earliest; Sequoia and NEA led larger growth rounds.
  • Strategic investors: Red Hat and Intel Capital invested in follow-on rounds, adding corporate strategic stakes.
  • Public-phase outcome: By IPO, founders’ combined holdings were reduced to low single-digit percentages while institutional shareholders held the majority of freely traded stock.

For context on competitors and market position that influenced investor interest and MongoDB ownership dynamics see Competitors Landscape of MongoDB

MongoDB SWOT Analysis

  • Complete SWOT Breakdown
  • Fully Customizable
  • Editable in Excel & Word
  • Professional Formatting
  • Investor-Ready Format
Get Related Template

How Has MongoDB’s Ownership Changed Over Time?

Key events that reshaped MongoDB ownership include early VC financings (2008–2015) that broadened the cap table, the October 19, 2017 IPO that introduced one-share–one-vote public stock, follow-on and secondary liquidity events through 2019–2021, and 2022–2024 market volatility that shifted holdings toward large passive funds and growth managers.

Period Ownership Dynamics Notable Stakeholders / Effects
2008–2015 Multiple VC rounds (Series A–F) expanded cap table and diluted founders VCs included Sequoia, NEA, USV, Flybridge, Intel Capital, Red Hat; founders’ stakes declined
Oct 19, 2017 IPO Priced at $24 per share; raised ~$192M; opened market cap ~$1.2–$1.6B Transition to one-share–one-vote common stock; increased institutional participation
2019–2021 Follow-on offerings, insider sales, and hypergrowth broadened float and ETF/index inclusion Higher passive ownership; former VCs trimmed positions via secondaries
2022–2024 Macro-driven multiple compression and market-cap swings altered top-holder mix Market cap ranged from >$30B to mid-$20B, then back toward $30–$40B; passive funds rose

As of 2024–2025, major institutional investors typically include The Vanguard Group, BlackRock, and T. Rowe Price among the largest holders; combined passive ownership (Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street) commonly represents 20–30%+ of float in comparable large-cap software names, and MongoDB generally follows this pattern. Insider ownership (founders, executives, directors) aggregates to low- to mid-single digits, with individual founders and the CEO holding sub-5% stakes each; legacy VC stakes have largely been distributed or reduced, though some residual positions may remain.

Icon

Ownership Inflection Points

Major shareholders shifted from concentrated VC ownership to broad institutional and passive ownership after IPO and secondary offerings.

  • 2008–2015: VC-led dilution established a wide cap table
  • 2017 IPO: public float and one-share–one-vote structure increased institutional influence
  • 2019–2021: secondary sales and index inclusion raised passive ETF ownership
  • 2022–2024: market-cap volatility elevated large mutual funds and growth managers

For further strategic context and growth history, see Growth Strategy of MongoDB

MongoDB PESTLE Analysis

  • Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
  • No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
  • Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
  • Instant Download, Ready to Use
  • 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Get Related Template

Who Sits on MongoDB’s Board?

As of 2024–2025, MongoDB's board combines founder continuity and independent operators: Dev Ittycheria (President & CEO), Dwight Merriman (Co‑founder), Roelof Botha and several independent directors with cloud, cybersecurity and GTM experience, reflecting a one‑share‑one‑vote public governance model.

Director Role / Background Notes on Governance
Dev Ittycheria President & CEO Executive director; operational leader influencing strategy and compensation
Dwight Merriman Co‑founder Founder continuity; retains insider perspective though not a supervoting holder
Roelof Botha Sequoia partner / board veteran Experienced independent chair across tech boards; represents historical VC influence
Hope Cochran Former CFO (King/Clearwire) Financial oversight and audit committee expertise
Tom Killalea Former Amazon VP of Security Cybersecurity and product security expertise
Charles 'Chuck' Robbins Cisco CEO / independent director Enterprise GTM and large‑cap public company experience

MongoDB employs a one‑share‑one‑vote capital structure with no dual‑class or supervoting shares; voting power is dispersed among insiders, institutions and index managers, and proxy outcomes are typically driven by large passive holders and active institutional investors.

Icon

Board composition and voting dynamics

The board mixes founder presence with independent operators; governance debates have centered on executive pay and equity dilution rather than control.

  • One‑share‑one‑vote structure; no founder‑class shares
  • Founder representation via Dwight Merriman; Sequoia's role has diminished as funds sold down holdings
  • Proxy influence concentrated among large index funds (Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street) and active institutions
  • Say‑on‑pay votes have passed with typical large‑cap support levels; no headline proxy battles to 2025

For institutional ownership details, filings show insiders and officers own low single‑digit percentages collectively, while top institutional investors typically hold between 5%15% each depending on reporting date; see SEC 13F/DEF 14A for current stakes and Target Market of MongoDB for related company context.

MongoDB Business Model Canvas

  • Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
  • Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
  • Investor-Ready BMC Format
  • 100% Editable and Customizable
  • Clear and Structured Layout
Get Related Template

What Recent Changes Have Shaped MongoDB’s Ownership Landscape?

Recent trends in MongoDB ownership show growing institutional and passive investor presence from 2021–2025, rising insider liquidity through structured sales, and steady dilution offset by strong Atlas-driven revenue growth and disciplined stock-based compensation.

Trend Key Data / Impact Implication for Ownership
Rising institutional/passive ownership Inclusion in major indices; Vanguard and BlackRock among top holders; passive ETFs increased stake 2021–2025 Greater voting power for stewardship teams; more stable, long-term holders
Insider sales & refresh grants Periodic 10b5-1 sales 2022–2025; SBC as % of sales trending to mid-teens; Atlas > 60% of revenue Modest insider dilution mitigated by revenue growth; founder ownership decreased
Capital allocation & secondaries No transformational buybacks through 2025; opportunistic secondaries used; cash prioritized for R&D and cloud infra Ownership not concentrated via buybacks; liquidity events supported insider diversification
M&A & partnerships Expanded Atlas availability on AWS, Azure, Google Cloud; selective acquihires Stronger fundamentals attract institutional investors without changing control
Governance & leadership CEO Dev Ittycheria continuity; board majority independent; founder day-to-day role declined after 2020 One-share-one-vote maintained; lower concentrated insider ownership

Analyst consensus through 2025 points to continued dispersion of MongoDB shareholders: gradual passive growth tied to index weight, modest insider dilution, and no signs of dual-class conversion, privatization, or emergence of a controlling owner.

Icon Institutional concentration

Top institutional investors (Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street) together hold a material portion of free float, influencing director elections and say-on-pay votes.

Icon Insider liquidity patterns

Executives used 10b5-1 plans 2022–2025 for planned sales while equity grants continued, keeping insider percentage steadily lower than at IPO.

Icon Revenue-driven dilution control

Atlas growth (surpassing 60% of revenue by mid-2020s) and SBC as a share of sales in the mid-teens helped offset dilution concerns among MongoDB shareholders.

Icon Where to verify holdings

SEC filings (Form 4, 13D/G) and institutional proxy reports list who owns MongoDB company shares; see this article on the Revenue Streams & Business Model of MongoDB for related context.

MongoDB Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
  • Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
  • 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
  • Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
  • Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
Get Related Template

Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.