Who Owns Inter Parfums Company?

Inter Parfums Bundle

Get Bundle
Get Full Bundle:
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10

TOTAL:

Who owns Inter Parfums?

Is Inter Parfums still led by its founders and how does that affect control and strategy? Founded in 1982 by Jean Madar and Philippe Benacin, the group combines founder-led stakes with broad public and institutional ownership after listing on NASDAQ (IPAR).

Who Owns Inter Parfums Company?

Founder family stakes, management voting arrangements, and large institutional holders together shape governance; recent 2024 deals like the Lacoste license amplified scale and investor attention. See Inter Parfums Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Who Founded Inter Parfums?

Founders and Early Ownership of Inter Parfums trace to 1982 in France, when Jean Madar and Philippe Benacin launched a prestige fragrance house focused on licensing, creation and global distribution; the U.S. holding company followed mid-1980s to access capital markets and scale internationally.

Icon

Founders

Jean Madar and Philippe Benacin co-founded the business; Madar became Chairman & CEO of Inter Parfums, Inc., Benacin Vice Chairman and head of the Paris subsidiary.

Icon

Initial Focus

The firm focused on long-term, exclusive licenses with luxury and aspirational brands and on investing in product creation and distribution.

Icon

Early Capital

Early financing was founder-driven with friends-and-family support; there are no public records of VC-style rounds typical of tech startups.

Icon

Equity Split

Equity and control were split roughly evenly between Madar and Benacin to reflect a shared strategic vision and joint control arrangements.

Icon

Governance Evolution

Informal buy-sell understandings evolved into formal lockups and coordinated voting as the group prepared for public listings in the U.S. and Paris.

Icon

Continuity

No material founder disputes were disclosed; the founders institutionalized governance while preserving a controlling bloc across the parent and subsidiary.

Founders retained meaningful executive ownership early on; by the time of public listings in the late 1980s the founders and affiliated entities controlled a substantial voting bloc that shaped Inter Parfums ownership and strategy.

Icon

Founders' Ownership and Early Structure

Key facts on early ownership, governance and structure for readers researching who owns Inter Parfums and the company's founding ownership:

  • Founders: Jean Madar (Chairman & CEO, Inter Parfums, Inc.) and Philippe Benacin (Vice Chairman; CEO of Interparfums SA).
  • Initial equity: concentrated between the two founders with roughly equal control and founder-driven financing.
  • Corporate form: French operating house (1982) with a U.S. holding company established mid-1980s to access U.S. capital markets and support global expansion.
  • Governance: informal founder agreements evolved into formal lockups and coordinated voting ahead of public listings; no public record of material disputes.

For background on the company mission and governance that framed founders' decisions see Mission, Vision & Core Values of Inter Parfums.

Inter Parfums SWOT Analysis

  • Complete SWOT Breakdown
  • Fully Customizable
  • Editable in Excel & Word
  • Professional Formatting
  • Investor-Ready Format
Get Related Template

How Has Inter Parfums’s Ownership Changed Over Time?

Key events shaping Inter Parfums ownership include the U.S. parent listing on NASDAQ, its sustained majority stake in Interparfums SA on Euronext Paris, and landmark licensing wins (Jimmy Choo, Montblanc, Coach, Lacoste) that expanded revenue and reinforced founder control.

Event / Item Impact on Ownership Notable Data (2024–2025)
NASDAQ listing of Inter Parfums, Inc. Established U.S. public parent and primary trading vehicle Basic shares outstanding ~31–32 million
Majority stake in Interparfums SA Consolidation of European operations and profits Parent ownership historically in the low-70% range
Long-term licenses (2009–2024) Revenue scaling, market-cap growth, founder influence preserved Licenses include Jimmy Choo (2009), Montblanc (2010), Coach (2015), Lacoste (effective 2024)

Ownership combines concentrated founder influence with broad institutional holdings; the dual listing and consolidated structure enable centralized capital allocation while preserving European operational alignment.

Icon

Ownership snapshot and strategic effects

Founders retain significant voting power; institutions provide governance and liquidity. The structure balances long-term strategy with public-market discipline.

  • Founders Jean Madar and Philippe Benacin—combined beneficial ownership commonly cited near the mid-40% range
  • Inter Parfums, Inc. often holds a majority interest in Interparfums SA—historically low-70%s
  • Key institutional holders: Vanguard, BlackRock, Dimensional, State Street; each often mid- to high-single-digit stakes
  • Free float composed of mutual funds, index funds, retail investors; institutional ownership increased with liquidity and index dynamics

Strategic consequences: founder stakes support long-horizon license selection and reinvestment; institutional oversight has driven improved disclosure, risk controls and dividend discipline; for further context see Growth Strategy of Inter Parfums.

Inter Parfums PESTLE Analysis

  • Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
  • No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
  • Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
  • Instant Download, Ready to Use
  • 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Get Related Template

Who Sits on Inter Parfums’s Board?

Inter Parfums, Inc. board combines founder-led leadership and independent oversight: Jean Madar (Chairman & CEO), Philippe Benacin (Vice Chairman; CEO of Interparfums SA), Russell Greenberg (EVP & CFO; Director) and independent directors including Patrick Choël, Gilbert Harrison, and Veronique Gabai-Pinsky.

Director Role Notes
Jean Madar Chairman & CEO Founder; significant equity holder and executive control
Philippe Benacin Vice Chairman; CEO Interparfums SA Operational leader of French subsidiary; board seat aligns U.S. parent and French ops
Russell Greenberg EVP & CFO; Director Executive director responsible for finance and investor reporting
Patrick Choël Independent Director Typical independent with beauty/retail experience; chairs key committee
Gilbert Harrison Independent Director Finance/board governance expertise; often chairs audit or nom/gov
Veronique Gabai-Pinsky Independent Director Industry executive perspective; part of compensation or governance oversight

The board balance reflects founders holding board seats proportional to their ownership and operating roles; independent directors represent public shareholders and lead audit, compensation and nominating/governance committees to ensure governance rigor.

Icon

Board & Voting Snapshot

Inter Parfums uses a one-share-one-vote common stock structure, with founders’ sizable stakes creating practical control despite no super-voting shares.

  • Board composition mixes founders/executives and independent directors
  • Independents typically chair audit, compensation and nom/gov committees
  • No dual-class or golden share disclosed; voting is proportional to holdings
  • Governance topics: board refreshment, succession, related-party matters with French subsidiary

As of 2025 proxy filings, founders (including Jean Madar) and affiliated entities collectively held a controlling equity bloc often cited in filings as exceeding 40% of outstanding shares, while institutional shareholders (Vanguard, BlackRock, Norges, etc.) comprise the largest parts of the public float; the company has not faced major proxy contests, and shareholder engagement centers on succession planning, executive ownership alignment and transparency around related-party transactions. See Revenue Streams & Business Model of Inter Parfums for complementary context on corporate operations.

Inter Parfums Business Model Canvas

  • Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
  • Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
  • Investor-Ready BMC Format
  • 100% Editable and Customizable
  • Clear and Structured Layout
Get Related Template

What Recent Changes Have Shaped Inter Parfums’s Ownership Landscape?

Recent developments through 2023–2025 show rising institutional ownership and index-linked flows as Inter Parfums’ public float expanded alongside record sales and new licenses, while founder-led ownership remained materially intact with steady dividend increases and limited buybacks.

Topic Key Facts Implication
2023–2025 growth & licenses Record 2023 sales ~$1.32B; major contributors Montblanc, Jimmy Choo, Coach; Lacoste launches ramping 2024–2025 Higher market cap attracted passive/index flows and new institutional holders
Dividends & capital returns Dividend raised consecutively; buybacks limited and opportunistic Supports income-focused investors; founder stake largely undiluted
Insider & institutional dynamics Founder retains significant stake; institutional ownership trended up with index inclusions Balanced governance: founder influence with growing passive investor presence

Insider equity compensation caused modest dilution, offset by earnings growth; no controlling acquirer or dual-class move announced, and board messaging emphasizes founder-led continuity, regional leadership strengthening, and selective M&A/license strategy.

Icon Licensing momentum

License wins with Lacoste (rollout through 2024–2025) and performance from Coach and Jimmy Choo drove sales expansion and attracted institutional shareholders.

Icon Shareholder mix

Index inclusions and higher market cap increased passive ownership share; institutional holdings rose but no single third-party control emerged.

Icon Dividends vs buybacks

Consistent dividend increases signal durable cash flow; buybacks used selectively, keeping founder and institution percentages relatively stable.

Icon Governance outlook

One-share-one-vote retained; governance scrutiny rising due to prestige fragrance consolidation and passive ownership trends—institutions likely to monitor license-driven growth and dividend policy.

For additional historical context on who founded and how ownership evolved, see Brief History of Inter Parfums

Inter Parfums Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
  • Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
  • 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
  • Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
  • Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
Get Related Template

Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.