Who Owns Hayward Company?

Hayward Bundle

Get Bundle
Get Full Bundle:
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10

TOTAL:

Who owns Hayward now?

Hayward Holdings, Inc. moved from private-equity control to public shareholders with its March 12, 2021 IPO (NYSE: HAYW). Founded in 1925, it now reports FY2024 revenue near $1.5–$1.6 billion and mid‑20s EBITDA margins, with ownership split between the public float, private equity remnants, and insiders.

Who Owns Hayward Company?

Major holders include institutional investors and remaining private-equity stakes; board and management retain influence while the public float increases; see product context in Hayward Porter's Five Forces Analysis.

Who Founded Hayward?

Hayward was founded in 1925 by Irving Hayward as Hayward Industries, initially making industrial flow‑control components before expanding into pool equipment mid‑century. Early ownership remained concentrated in the Hayward family, with control professionalizing as the firm scaled.

Icon

Founder background

Irving Hayward was a tool‑and‑die craftsman and entrepreneur who established the company in 1925 to serve industrial customers.

Icon

Initial products

The business focused on industrial flow‑control components before diversifying into pool pumps and filtration equipment around mid‑20th century.

Icon

Early ownership

Ownership was closely held within the Hayward family; specific early equity percentages were not publicly disclosed, typical for privately held manufacturers then.

Icon

Capital and backers

Notable early backers were local lenders and trade partners, not venture‑style investors; financing reflected conservative capital structure norms.

Icon

Ownership transition

By the late 20th century leadership shifted to professional managers while the family retained a meaningful but declining economic interest.

Icon

Equity mechanics

No public record shows formal founder vesting like modern startups; ownership evolved via generational transfer, redemptions, and later private equity recapitalizations.

Early corporate governance and control reflected the founder’s practical vision: product reliability, channel‑centric distribution, and modest leverage; there were no prominent public litigated buy‑sell events disclosed prior to private equity involvement.

Icon

Key facts and timeline

Founders and early ownership shaped Hayward’s long‑term strategy and eventual ownership changes.

  • Founded in 1925 by Irving Hayward in industrial flow‑control
  • Mid‑20th century expansion into pool equipment established core brand
  • Early financing primarily from local banks and trade partners, not venture capital
  • Family ownership transitioned to professional management before later private equity recapitalizations

For broader context on later ownership events and strategic moves, see Growth Strategy of Hayward

Hayward SWOT Analysis

  • Complete SWOT Breakdown
  • Fully Customizable
  • Editable in Excel & Word
  • Professional Formatting
  • Investor-Ready Format
Get Related Template

How Has Hayward’s Ownership Changed Over Time?

Key events reshaping Hayward ownership include the April 2017 CCMP Capital Advisors buyout, pre‑IPO refinancings and bolt‑ons (2017–2020), the March 12, 2021 IPO (HAYW) and subsequent secondary sales (2021–2023) that reduced sponsor concentration and broadened institutional ownership.

Event Year Impact on Ownership
CCMP PE Buyout 2017 Control transferred to CCMP; management co‑invested; deal ~$1.0–$1.1 billion
Pre‑IPO Recapitalizations & M&A 2017–2020 PE‑led ownership retained; balance sheet refinanced; bolt‑ons expanded product scope
IPO (HAYW) 2021‑03‑12 ~40 million shares @ $17; implied market cap ~$4.0–$4.5 billion; EV ~$5–$6 billion; proceeds used to delever
Post‑IPO Secondaries 2021–2023 CCMP and co‑sellers sold shares, raising free float and lowering sponsor stake
Current stakeholder mix 2024–2025 CCMP mid–high teens %; executives low single‑digit %; index funds (Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street) collectively >20%

Ownership evolution moved Hayward from family control to PE stewardship and then to a public, institutionally held company, while CCMP retained board influence and a material residual stake that shaped capital allocation and channel strategy; see a compact company context in the Brief History of Hayward.

Icon

Major stakeholders and ownership facts

Key ownership facts and current stakeholder roles affecting Hayward corporate owner and public-market governance.

  • CCMP Capital‑related entities: retained a mid‑ to high‑teens % stake by 2024–2025 after secondary sales
  • Executive/Insider ownership: CEO Kevin Holleran and senior team hold low‑single‑digit aggregate percentages via RSUs/PSUs/options
  • Institutional holders: Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street and active managers (T. Rowe Price, Fidelity, Wellington) collectively often exceed 20%+ ownership
  • IPO metrics: ~40M shares at $17, market cap near $4.0–$4.5B, EV ~$5–$6B

Hayward PESTLE Analysis

  • Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
  • No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
  • Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
  • Instant Download, Ready to Use
  • 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Get Related Template

Who Sits on Hayward’s Board?

Hayward's board in 2024–2025 blends management and independent directors, with Kevin Holleran serving as President & CEO and a majority of independents overseeing audit, capital markets, and operations as sponsor ownership declines.

Director Role / Expertise Affiliation
Kevin Holleran President & CEO; management seat Executive
Teresa S. Madden Independent; audit and finance expertise Independent
Michael D. Hartmeier Independent; capital markets and finance Independent
Jonathan M. Foster Independent; industrials and private equity experience Independent
CCMP‑affiliated directors Represent sponsor interests; may rotate as ownership declines Sponsor representatives
Other independents Channel, manufacturing, global operations backgrounds Independent

Hayward operates a one‑share‑one‑vote capital structure, so voting power aligns with economic ownership; board committees (audit, compensation, nominating) are chaired by independents and independent directors form the majority as CCMP reduces its stake.

Icon

Board composition and voting implications

Majority independent board with management representation; voting maps to share ownership under one‑share‑one‑vote rules.

  • Independent directors constitute the majority, chairing key committees
  • CCMP‑affiliated seats reflect sponsor interests but rotate as ownership declines
  • With one‑share‑one‑vote, outsized control typically requires a holder above 20–30%
  • Recent transactions and step‑down secondaries have reduced concentrated control risk

Proxy activity: no recent contested proxy fights disclosed through mid‑2025; routine say‑on‑pay votes have passed and board refreshment has trended toward greater independence as sponsor ownership decreased from peak levels—public filings in 2024 showed CCMP's stake declining versus prior years, lowering sponsor voting influence.

For context on Hayward corporate strategy and brand positioning, see Marketing Strategy of Hayward

Hayward Business Model Canvas

  • Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
  • Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
  • Investor-Ready BMC Format
  • 100% Editable and Customizable
  • Clear and Structured Layout
Get Related Template

What Recent Changes Have Shaped Hayward’s Ownership Landscape?

Hayward ownership shifted from pandemic-era concentration to a more dispersed public float between 2022–2025, driven by inventory normalization, opportunistic sponsor secondary sales, and rising passive index ownership; management prioritized margin protection and controlled capital returns while reducing net leverage targets.

Period Key Ownership/Capital Move Impact (2024–2025)
2022–2024 Inventory normalization; sponsor secondary transactions Float expanded; share price volatility; opportunistic secondaries increased free float
2023–2025 Deleveraging target near 2–3x EBITDA; selective buybacks Cumulative repurchases in the tens of millions, lowering shares outstanding by under 3–5%
2023–2025 Institutional index inclusion (passive ownership rise) Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street collectively increased holdings; sponsor CCMP trimmed stake

CEO Kevin Holleran (appointed 2020) provided leadership continuity; insider sales were programmatic for diversification/tax reasons rather than control transfers, and no founder-family governance role exists.

Icon Capital allocation focus

Board-authorized buybacks in 2023–2024 reduced float modestly while net leverage was guided toward 2–3x EBITDA to maintain investment-grade-like metrics.

Icon Institutional ownership trend

Index inclusion pushed passive ownership higher; the largest passive holders—Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street—now form a growing block typical of mid-cap industrials.

Icon Sponsor activity

Private equity sponsor CCMP reduced its position through secondary sales and trims between 2022–2025, enabling residual exits without triggering privatization.

Icon M&A and outlook

Management and analysts expect potential strategic M&A financed to preserve leverage targets; float may continue to expand while buybacks remain opportunistic and cash-flow dependent. Read more in Competitors Landscape of Hayward

Hayward Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
  • Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
  • 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
  • Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
  • Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
Get Related Template

Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.