Who Owns Deere Company?

Deere Bundle

Get Full Bundle:

	5 FORCES	$15	$10
	BCG	$15	$10
	CANVAS	$15	$10
	4P's MIX	$15	$10
	PESTLE	$15	$10
	SWOT	$15	$10

TOTAL:

ADD TO CART

Who owns Deere Company?

Deere & Company evolved from John Deere’s 1837 blacksmith shop into a publicly traded industrial leader; today ownership is dispersed across institutional investors, retail shareholders, and insiders, shaping strategy, capital allocation, and governance.

Public institutions—large asset managers and index funds—hold the largest blocks, while insiders and retail investors retain smaller stakes; ownership concentration affects buybacks, dividends, and strategic direction. See Deere Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Deere & Company traces to John Deere (born 1804), a Vermont blacksmith who in 1837 built the self‑scouring steel plow that transformed Midwestern agriculture; the firm grew from his sole proprietorship in Moline, Illinois into partnerships and then incorporation in 1868.

Founder and invention

John Deere invented the self‑scouring steel plow in 1837, catalyzing farm productivity across the Midwest.

From sole proprietorship

In the 1840s–1850s Deere operated as a sole proprietor, later forming partnerships to scale production in Moline.

Charles Deere

Charles Deere (1837–1907) joined management mid‑1850s and led commercial expansion and operational control by the 1880s.

Early partnership structure

Partnerships such as Deere, Tate & Gould aligned control with the Deere family and a small circle of associates rather than issuing modern equity splits.

1868 incorporation

The 1868 incorporation in Illinois issued shares to John, Charles and a limited number of partners, institutionalizing governance while retaining family influence.

Transition to public ownership

Family control persisted through late 19th and early 20th centuries until ownership broadened into public markets over subsequent decades.

Early outside backers were regional merchants and managers holding minority stakes; orderly transfers relied on partnership agreements rather than modern vesting or buy‑sell clauses, and no major early cap‑table disputes are recorded.

Key facts on founders and ownership

Founders, succession, and early ownership highlights for Deere & Company.

• John Deere founded the business after his 1837 plow innovation, operating as a sole proprietor through the 1840s–1850s.
• Charles Deere became central to management by the mid‑1850s and guided expansion into the 1880s–1890s.
• Deere & Company incorporated in Illinois in 1868, issuing shares to family and close partners to formalize governance.
• Control remained within the Deere family orbit into the 20th century before widening via public share issuance and institutional investors.

For related historical context and a concise company timeline see Brief History of Deere

Deere SWOT Analysis

• Complete SWOT Breakdown
• Fully Customizable
• Editable in Excel & Word
• Professional Formatting
• Investor-Ready Format

GET TEMPLATE ➔

Key events shaping john deere ownership include the 1868 incorporation, generational transfers through the early 1900s, post‑WWII public float expansion, NYSE listing and institutionalization mid‑20th century, and large-scale buybacks and index driven ownership trends through 2010s–2025.

The deere company owners today are predominantly institutional investors, while deere family shareholders retain a nominal economic and governance legacy rather than controlling voting power; free float and treasury share dynamics are shaped by ongoing repurchases and dividends.

Major ownership themes 1868–2025

Ownership evolved from founder·family concentration to broad institutional holdings; strategic direction now aligns with institutional preferences for capital returns and recurring revenue.

• Founding era: concentrated john deere ownership among Deere family and insiders
• Mid‑20th: dilution of family stake as public markets deepened
• 2024–2025 filings: top holders are Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street (mid‑ to high‑single‑digit stakes each)
• Insider ownership remains low; no dual‑class shares; free float effectively encompasses common equity

For context on strategy and how ownership affects capital allocation and product focus, see Growth Strategy of Deere.

Deere PESTLE Analysis

• Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
• No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
• Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
• Instant Download, Ready to Use
• 100% Editable, Fully Customizable

GET TEMPLATE ➔

As of 2024–2025, Deere & Company’s board comprises the CEO plus a majority of independent directors with expertise in industrial technology, agriculture, software/AI, finance, and global operations; governance follows a one‑share‑one‑vote common stock model without dual‑class or super‑voting shares.

The board’s standing committees—audit, compensation, nominating/governance—oversee capital allocation and stewardship; no recent proxy battles or control contests have altered voting power, and insider holdings remain limited relative to the public float.

Board voting dynamics to watch

Institutional voting policies and proxy advisors largely determine governance outcomes; key recurring agenda items include say‑on‑pay, climate, human capital, and right‑to‑repair proposals.

• One‑share‑one‑vote: no dual‑class shares
• No designated institutional board seats; representation via engagement
• Mega‑indexers concentrate voting influence despite non‑controlling stakes
• Insider ownership small relative to float; institutions and proxy firms drive results

For context on strategic positioning and shareholder relations see Marketing Strategy of Deere.

Deere Business Model Canvas

• Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
• Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
• Investor-Ready BMC Format
• 100% Editable and Customizable
• Clear and Structured Layout

GET TEMPLATE ➔

Institutional ownership of Deere & Company has remained high from 2019–2025, with top index and active managers among the largest holders; sizable share repurchases and sustained dividend increases have concentrated ownership while supporting per‑share metrics.

Strategic investment shifts toward autonomy, computer vision and precision software—backed by targeted M&A and partnerships—aim to grow recurring, higher‑margin revenue and appeal to long‑horizon institutional investors, while no dual‑class conversion or take‑private moves have been signaled.

Institutional concentration

Major mutual funds and ETFs dominate the register; proxy voting by a few large managers increasingly shapes ESG and capital allocation outcomes.

Capital return policy

Board authorizations since 2020 supported recurring buybacks funded by cycle cash flows, preserving dividend growth and shareholder yield.

Ownership structure

Insider and family ownership remain low relative to institutions; there is no controlling shareholder or dual‑class structure as of 2025.

Governance dynamics

Succession planning favors continuity under a seasoned CEO and independent chair; proxy policies of major asset managers affect right‑to‑repair and ESG votes.

Analyst guidance and 2025 commentary indicate continued opportunistic buybacks tied to agricultural cycles, sustained institutional dominance in the deere stock ownership breakdown, low insider holdings, and no expected structural change to public listing or voting rights; see a focused review of the company’s revenue mix: Revenue Streams & Business Model of Deere

Deere Porter's Five Forces Analysis

• Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
• Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
• 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
• Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
• Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked

GET TEMPLATE ➔