B&G Foods Bundle
Who owns B&G Foods today?
When B&G Foods bought Green Giant from General Mills in 2015 for about $765,000,000, the deal reshaped its scale and public profile. Headquartered in Parsippany, NJ, B&G Foods manages brands like Green Giant, Ortega, and Cream of Wheat across North America.
Today B&G Foods, Inc. (NYSE: BGS) is a publicly traded, small‑to‑mid cap company with elevated leverage and a shareholder base led by institutional investors and mutual funds.
Explore ownership, governance, and competitive positioning in B&G Foods Porter's Five Forces Analysis.
Who Founded B&G Foods?
B&G Foods origins trace to 1889, when Julius Bloch and Meyer Guggenheimer — German-Jewish immigrant food merchants — founded Bloch & Guggenheimer in New York City to produce pickles, relish and preserved foods; ownership was closely held by the two families and financed by family capital and retained earnings.
Founders
Julius Bloch and Meyer Guggenheimer founded Bloch & Guggenheimer in 1889 on New York’s Lower East Side.
Initial ownership
Precise equity split at inception is not publicly documented; control remained within the two families.
Financing
Early financing came from family capital and retained earnings; no known institutional backers in the first decades.
Ownership agreements
Informal buy-sell understandings among heirs and partners were typical, keeping control inside founding families.
Mid-20th century
As distribution and product lines expanded, ownership broadened to descendants and operating partners without major litigated disputes.
Legacy
The founding vision — quality preserved foods for mass-market households — guided family stewardship for decades.
For a concise corporate timeline and later ownership shifts, see Brief History of B&G Foods.
Key early-ownership facts
Summary facts relevant to B&G Foods ownership history and research.
- Founded in 1889 by Julius Bloch and Meyer Guggenheimer.
- Early capital sources: family funds and retained earnings; no documented institutional investors.
- Ownership remained family-centric with informal heir/partner agreements; no major founder litigations recorded.
- Historical stewardship preserved the company’s mass-market preserved foods focus through mid-20th century.
B&G Foods SWOT Analysis
- Complete SWOT Breakdown
- Fully Customizable
- Editable in Excel & Word
- Professional Formatting
- Investor-Ready Format
How Has B&G Foods’s Ownership Changed Over Time?
Key events shaping B&G Foods ownership include private equity acquisition in the 1990s–2000s, the 2004 NYSE income deposit securities IPO, a 2010s roll‑up culminating in the $765,000,000 Green Giant purchase in 2015, and 2020s deleveraging with divestitures such as Back to Nature in 2022 for about $80,000,000.
| Period | Ownership/Action | Impact on structure |
|---|---|---|
| 1990s–early 2000s | Private equity stewardship (BRS lead sponsor) | Consolidation of brands; professionalized ops ahead of IPO |
| 2004 IPO | NYSE listing via income deposit securities; sponsors kept large stakes | Established public float for income investors; mid‑hundreds of millions market cap |
| 2010s | Roll‑up (Cream of Wheat 2007; Green Giant 2015 ~$765,000,000) | Scale increased; leverage rose; market cap ~$1.5–$3.0 billion |
| 2020s | Deleveraging and asset sales (Back to Nature 2022 ~$80,000,000) | Focus on core brands; reduced net debt/EBITDA emphasis |
Current major shareholders reflect institutional concentration: index and active managers now drive governance priorities, while insider stakes remain minimal.
Major holders and governance effects
Top institutional holders as of 2024–2025 SEC filings and investor databases approximate ownership ranges and influence corporate priorities.
- BlackRock, Inc. — approximately 12–15% beneficial ownership
- The Vanguard Group — approximately 10–13%
- Dimensional Fund Advisors — approximately 5–7%
- State Street/SSGA — approximately 4–6%
- GAMCO Investors (Gabelli) — low‑ to mid‑single digits, sometimes near 5%
- Insiders (directors & executives combined) — generally <2%
Institutional ownership concentration has emphasized free cash flow, dividend sustainability, Net debt/EBITDA targets, portfolio pruning, price‑pack architecture, and proxy voting norms; active managers have pressured balance sheet discipline and margin recovery—see Mission, Vision & Core Values of B&G Foods for related corporate context.
B&G Foods PESTLE Analysis
- Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
- No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
- Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
- Instant Download, Ready to Use
- 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Who Sits on B&G Foods’s Board?
As of 2024–2025 proxy disclosures, B&G Foods' board blends management and independent directors, led by CEO Casey 'Ken' Keller as a director, with long-tenured consumer and financial expertise and former executives providing continuity.
| Director | Role / Tenure | Relevant Expertise |
|---|---|---|
| Casey 'Ken' Keller | Chief Executive Officer; Director | Consumer packaged goods operations |
| Stephen V. Sherrill | Investor representative; former Chair (BRS heritage) | Private equity / investor oversight |
| David L. Wenner | Former CEO; Director | Company continuity; CPG leadership |
| Independent finance/audit leader | Audit Committee member | Accounting, financial controls |
| Independent consumer/CPG operator | Compensation / Nominating committees | Brand and category management |
Voting follows a one-share-one-vote common stock structure with no dual-class shares or golden shares; institutional investors and any holder aggregating above approximately 10% therefore hold concentrated influence. Recent meetings featured standard director elections, say-on-pay votes, auditor ratification, and equity plan authorizations, with shareholder engagement focused on leverage, dividend policy, and ESG disclosures.
Board control and shareholder influence
Institutional ownership dominates B&G Foods ownership, making large funds decisive on governance and director elections.
- Top institutional holders (2024–2025 filings) include major asset managers typically holding 20–40% combined of outstanding BGS stock
- Insider ownership at the company remains below institutional stakes, limiting single-insider control
- No dual‑class or super‑voting shares; voting power maps directly to share counts
- Revenue Streams & Business Model of B&G Foods
B&G Foods Business Model Canvas
- Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
- Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
- Investor-Ready BMC Format
- 100% Editable and Customizable
- Clear and Structured Layout
What Recent Changes Have Shaped B&G Foods’s Ownership Landscape?
Recent ownership trends at B&G Foods show a shift toward value- and income-focused investors after the late-2022 dividend reset; institutional concentration rose modestly through 2023–2025 as passive indexing and selective active stakes increased while insider ownership stayed in low single digits.
| Area | Key development (2023–2025) |
|---|---|
| Dividend & balance sheet | Quarterly dividend cut to ~$0.19 per share in late 2022; cautious payouts maintained amid higher interest expense and a focus on deleveraging; Net debt/EBITDA targeted reduction. |
| Portfolio actions | Pruning continued (e.g., Back to Nature sale in 2022 for ~$80M); reinvestment behind Green Giant, Ortega, Dash; analysts flagged possible further divestitures to accelerate leverage improvement. |
| Share count & float | Limited share issuance and no large buyback programs in 2023–2025; indexing and passive fund inflows modestly increased stakes of BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street. |
| Insiders & governance | Insider ownership remains low single digits; CEO on the board; board/C-suite turnover aligned to operational priorities; no founder-family blocks. |
| Activism & market scrutiny | No headline proxy fights through 2024–2025; intermittent elevated short interest and credit-sensitive investor scrutiny on capital allocation and leverage targets. |
Ownership outlook favors continued institutional stability with potential incremental activist attention if deleveraging stalls; major changes likely via index weight shifts, block trades, or brand divestitures rather than privatization or dual-class moves.
Dividend and Deleveraging
The dividend reset to ~$0.19 per quarter refocused capital to debt paydown; higher interest costs in 2023–2025 kept payouts conservative, attracting income-selective holders.
Portfolio Prioritization
After the Back to Nature sale (~$80M in 2022), management funneled resources to Green Giant, Ortega, Dash while analysts in 2024–2025 expected more divestitures to improve Net debt/EBITDA.
Indexing and Passive Flows
With restrained share issuance and absent major buybacks, S&P/CRSP indexing and passive funds modestly boosted cumulative stakes of the largest asset managers in 2023–2025.
Governance Focus
Engagement centered on board refreshment, leverage targets, and dividend sustainability; no founder-family control or privatization signals through mid-2025.
For context on strategic choices that influence ownership and investor positioning, see Growth Strategy of B&G Foods.
B&G Foods Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
- Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
- 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
- Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
- Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
- What is Brief History of B&G Foods Company?
- What is Competitive Landscape of B&G Foods Company?
- What is Growth Strategy and Future Prospects of B&G Foods Company?
- How Does B&G Foods Company Work?
- What is Sales and Marketing Strategy of B&G Foods Company?
- What are Mission Vision & Core Values of B&G Foods Company?
- What is Customer Demographics and Target Market of B&G Foods Company?
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.