Who Owns Bank of Baroda Company?

Bank of Baroda Bundle

Get Bundle
Get Full Bundle:
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10
$15 $10

TOTAL:

Who owns Bank of Baroda today?

Bank of Baroda began under Maharaja Sayajirao Gaekwad III in 1908 and shifted to government control after the 1969 nationalization. It now operates as a majority state-owned public sector bank listed on NSE and BSE, balancing public-policy mandates with commercial banking.

Who Owns Bank of Baroda Company?

Majority stake rests with the Government of India via the Ministry of Finance; institutional and retail investors hold the remaining shares, including foreign institutional investors and mutual funds. See Bank of Baroda Porter's Five Forces Analysis for strategic context.

Who Founded Bank of Baroda?

Founded on 20 July 1908 by Maharaja Sayajirao Gaekwad III, Bank of Baroda began as a princely-state sponsored bank with ownership concentrated in the Baroda royal household and allied local merchant families; the Baroda State acted as sponsor and patron to mobilize savings and finance trade and industry.

Icon

Founder and Patron

Maharaja Sayajirao Gaekwad III founded the bank to spur regional development and industrial finance within Baroda State.

Icon

Initial Ownership Base

Early capital subscriptions came from the royal household and prominent local merchant families rather than dispersed public shareholders.

Icon

Baroda State Sponsorship

The Baroda State served as sponsor and exercised board influence, reflecting the Maharaja’s developmental priorities.

Icon

Governance Norms

Early governance featured board seats for state sponsors and leading financiers; director appointments mirrored founder prerogatives.

Icon

Equity Records

Detailed equity splits from 1908 are not publicly available; control effectively rested with the royal household and subscribing merchants.

Icon

Regulatory Context

Ownership changes were governed by Companies Act-era rules and sponsor discretion until post-independence reforms and eventual nationalization altered the ownership landscape.

Early ownership set the stage for BoB ownership structure shifts over decades, culminating in government-led changes in the 20th century; see related governance context in Mission, Vision & Core Values of Bank of Baroda.

Icon

Key Early Ownership Facts

Founding and control highlights relevant to 'Who owns Bank of Baroda' and 'Bank of Baroda ownership'.

  • Founded on 20 July 1908 by Maharaja Sayajirao Gaekwad III.
  • Initial control: Baroda State/royal household and select merchant families.
  • Detailed 1908 equity splits are not publicly available; governance reflected sponsor influence.
  • Ownership regime changed over time, ultimately influenced by government interventions and nationalization policies.

Bank of Baroda SWOT Analysis

  • Complete SWOT Breakdown
  • Fully Customizable
  • Editable in Excel & Word
  • Professional Formatting
  • Investor-Ready Format
Get Related Template

How Has Bank of Baroda’s Ownership Changed Over Time?

Key events that reshaped Bank of Baroda ownership include royal-state sponsorship at founding, nationalization in July 1969, listing and GDR issues in the 1990s–2000s, the 2019 amalgamation with Vijaya Bank and Dena Bank, and market equity raises including a 2020 QIP that further diversified the share register.

Period Ownership Changes Impact on Control
1908–1969 Private ownership led by Baroda royal family and regional merchants; overseas branches opened Private, localized control
July 1969 Nationalization under GoI via Banking Companies (Acquisition & Transfer of Undertakings) Act Government became promoter; public-policy alignment
1990s–2000s Listing on Indian exchanges; domestic issuances and GDRs reduced GoI stake from near-total Market scrutiny increased; diversified investor base
1 Apr 2019 Amalgamation with Vijaya Bank & Dena Bank; share exchange preserved GoI majority Scale and governance complexity rose; free float broadened
2020–2025 QIP (late 2020), employee issuances and market moves; institutional and FPI shareholding rose Promoter still majority but institutional influence increased

Current major stakeholders (FY2024–FY2025 disclosures) show Government of India as promoter with roughly mid-60s percent ownership, domestic institutions including LIC and mutual funds holding high-teens collectively, FPIs in the low- to mid-teens, and the remaining free float held by public retail, HNIs and employees.

Icon

Ownership dynamics to watch

Promoter control remains intact but market-issued equity and mergers have increased institutional influence and free float, affecting capital allocation and governance.

  • Promoter: Government of India ~64% (FY2024 disclosure)
  • Domestic institutions (LIC, mutual funds, insurers): collective high-teens %
  • FPIs: low- to mid-teens %
  • Public/Employees: remaining free float including employee schemes

For deeper context on business implications and revenue mix after the 2019 merger and subsequent capital raises see the related article Revenue Streams & Business Model of Bank of Baroda.

Bank of Baroda PESTLE Analysis

  • Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
  • No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
  • Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
  • Instant Download, Ready to Use
  • 100% Editable, Fully Customizable
Get Related Template

Who Sits on Bank of Baroda’s Board?

Bank of Baroda’s board (2024–2025) blends government nominees and independent experts: Hasmukh Adhia serves as Part-time Non-Executive Chairman (GoI nominee) and Debadatta Chand is Managing Director & CEO, supported by executive directors, non-executive shareholder nominees and an RBI nominee.

Role Representative / Status Governance Notes (2024–2025)
Part-time Non-Executive Chairman Hasmukh Adhia (GoI nominee) Promoter representation; former Finance Secretary
Managing Director & CEO Debadatta Chand Executive head; operational responsibility
Executive Directors Senior career bankers (GoI/RBI appointments) Day-to-day banking operations and business lines
Non-Executive / Independent Directors Mix of shareholder nominees, independent experts, RBI nominee Chair key committees (Audit, Risk, N&R) per SEBI/RBI norms

Bank of Baroda follows a one-share-one-vote model with no dual-class or super-voting shares; control derives from the Government of India’s promoter majority and statutory powers under the nationalized banks framework, supported by government/RBI-nominated directors.

Icon

Board balance and voting power

The GoI is the majority promoter, exercising control through shareholding and statutory appointment rights; independent directors lead key oversight committees to protect minority shareholders.

  • GoI holds the largest single stake as promoter under public sector bank ownership India rules; in 2024 GoI stake was reported around 63% (approx.) across consolidated shareholdings
  • No golden shares or dual-class structures; one-share-one-vote applies to BoB ownership structure
  • RBI/government nominees on board and committee chairs increase regulatory oversight; RBI directives (e.g., 2023 digital onboarding guidance) have affected governance priorities
  • Major shareholders Bank of Baroda include institutional investors (mutual funds, FPIs) and retail investors; foreign institutional investors stake is material but minority

For background on strategy and historical context of the bank’s ownership and mergers, see Marketing Strategy of Bank of Baroda.

Bank of Baroda Business Model Canvas

  • Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
  • Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
  • Investor-Ready BMC Format
  • 100% Editable and Customizable
  • Clear and Structured Layout
Get Related Template

What Recent Changes Have Shaped Bank of Baroda’s Ownership Landscape?

Recent developments in Bank of Baroda ownership show post-merger stabilization, rising institutional participation and gradual reduction in government stake, with the GoI holding near 64% by FY2024 after capital raises and improved free-float supporting higher index inclusion and ETF demand.

Period Key ownership change Notes
2019–2021 Merger integration Vijaya and Dena Bank merged into BoB; asset quality and capital ratios improved
Late‑2020–FY2024 QIP and issuances; GoI stake ~64% Market issuances increased institutional/free float depth; DIIs and FPIs rose
2023–2025 Regulatory & market positioning RBI action on BoB World app led to compliance strengthening; market cap and index weight gains attracted passive investors

Post-merger credit metrics and capital adequacy improved through FY2024–FY2025, driving profitability and drawing ETFs and index funds that increased passive ownership while the Government of India remains the majority shareholder; see the Brief History of Bank of Baroda for context on earlier ownership shifts.

Icon Post‑merger stabilization

Integration completed with improving asset quality and capital ratios, supporting higher institutional interest and index weight gains.

Icon Capital and float

Late‑2020 QIP plus follow‑on issuances reduced GoI holding to about 64% by FY2024, increasing free float and institutional depth.

Icon Regulatory governance impact

RBI restrictions on the BoB World app in 2023 prompted remedial compliance measures and stronger independent oversight, an ownership‑relevant governance improvement.

Icon Market positioning & outlook

Rising earnings and capital adequacy increased market cap and ETF/index participation; GoI signals intent to retain majority (>51%) in public sector banks, so further dilution is expected to be gradual and market‑driven rather than privatization.

Bank of Baroda Porter's Five Forces Analysis

  • Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
  • Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
  • 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
  • Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
  • Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked
Get Related Template

Disclaimer

All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.

We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.

All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.